Holding that in mental health disability cases "it is error to reject a claimant's testimony merely because symptoms wax and wane in the course of treatment"
Holding that nonexamining physicians' opinions may "serve as substantial evidence when the opinions are consistent with independent clinical findings or other evidence in the record"
Holding that although an ALJ erred in assessing a claimant's testimony, a conflict between that testimony and the objective medical evidence warranted remand for further proceedings
Holding that "contradictions in the claimant's own testimony about his activities of daily living" can support an ALJ's negative credibility determination
Holding that a treating physician's reliance on a patient's own discredited subjective complaints is a specific and legitimate reason for discounting the physician's opinion
Defining sedentary work as "involv[ing] lifting no more than 10 pounds at a time and occasionally lifting or carrying articles like docket files, ledgers, and small tools" as well as "involv[ing] sitting a certain amount of walking and standing"