27 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 263,477 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 276,716 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Phillips v. County of Allegheny

    515 F.3d 224 (3d Cir. 2008)   Cited 17,334 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court need not permit a curative amendment if such amendment would be futile
  4. Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside

    578 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 14,432 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"
  5. In re Burlington Coat Factory

    114 F.3d 1410 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 7,962 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court may consider a "document integral to or explicitly relied upon in the complaint" when deciding a motion to dismiss
  6. Malleus v. George

    641 F.3d 560 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 2,712 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding inquiry is normally broken into three parts: identifying the elements of a claim, reviewing the complaint to strike conclusory allegations, and then looking at the well-pleaded components of the complaint and evaluating whether all of the elements identified in part one of the inquiry are sufficiently alleged.
  7. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.

    998 F.2d 1192 (3d Cir. 1993)   Cited 6,340 times
    Holding that, when reviewing a motion to dismiss, courts consider "allegations contained in the complaint, exhibits attached to the complaint and matters of public record"
  8. Maio v. Aetna, Inc.

    221 F.3d 472 (3d Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,126 times
    Holding no RICO cause of action because factual predicate necessary for damages to be incurred at all too speculative
  9. Weston v. Pennsylvania

    251 F.3d 420 (3d Cir. 2001)   Cited 1,027 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding written reprimands were not adverse employment actions because they had not caused a "material change in the terms or conditions of his employment"
  10. Kachmar v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc.

    109 F.3d 173 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 934 times
    Holding that Congress did not intend to hold individual employees liable under Title VII, which is parallel to the ADEA in many ways
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 357,835 times   950 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 162,084 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 35,874 times   1249 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  14. Section 201 - Short title

    29 U.S.C. § 201   Cited 21,367 times   104 Legal Analyses
    Setting fourteen as the minimum age for most non-agricultural work
  15. Section 215 - Prohibited acts; prima facie evidence

    29 U.S.C. § 215   Cited 2,701 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing as a protected activity an individual's “testif[ying] ... in any such proceeding” “under or related to this chapter”
  16. Section 260.1 - Short title

    43 Pa. Stat. § 260.1   Cited 219 times   1 Legal Analyses

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Wage Payment and Collection Law." 43 P.S. § 260.1 1961, July 14, P.L. 637, § 1, effective in 30 days.