9 Cited authorities

  1. In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.

    960 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 675 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Shutts did not require opt-out rights in a Rule 23(b)(B) class action because the plaintiffs had already submitted to the district court's jurisdiction by filing bankruptcy claims against the defendant
  2. Huber v. Casablanca Ind., Inc.

    506 U.S. 1088 (1993)   Cited 65 times

    No. 90-1092. January 25, 1993, October TERM, 1992. Dismissal Under Rule 46 C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 46. Reported below: 916 F. 2d 85.

  3. Foley v. Transocean Ltd.

    272 F.R.D. 126 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)   Cited 95 times
    Rejecting challenge that Danish pension fund would "saddle the class with unnecessary and additional costs"; "courts in this District and others have routinely appointed foreign investors as lead plaintiff"
  4. Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.

    939 F. Supp. 57 (D. Mass. 1996)   Cited 72 times
    Holding that only named plaintiffs, rather than all parties moving for appointment as lead plaintiff, need comply with the certification requirement
  5. In re Tronox, Inc. Securities Litigation

    262 F.R.D. 338 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 33 times
    Finding that purchases following partial corrective disclosures that do not “sufficiently correct ... prior false and misleading statements” do not render proposed lead plaintiff atypical.
  6. Barnet v. Elan Corp.

    236 F.R.D. 158 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)   Cited 33 times
    Noting split
  7. Strougo v. Brantley Capital Corp.

    243 F.R.D. 100 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)   Cited 22 times

    [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Robert I. Harwood, Wechsler Harwood LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs. DECISION AND ORDER ROBINSON, District Judge. I. Background A. Procedural History Barbara Strougo (" Strougo" ) filed suit on November 17, 2006 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 on behalf of herself and all others who purchased or otherwise acquired shares of Brantley Capital Corporation (" Brantley" ) between August 14, 2003 and October 24, 2005 (the " Class Period" ).

  8. In re General Electric Securities Litigation

    09 Civ. 1951 (DC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2009)   Cited 12 times
    Consolidating actions raising Exchange Act claims where there was "substantial overlap in the complaints"
  9. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,386 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party