17 Cited authorities

Roberts v. United States Jaycees
468 U.S. 609 (1984) Cited 2,029 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that infringement of the right to associate "may be justified by regulations adopted to serve compelling state interests, unrelated to the suppression of ideas, that cannot be achieved through means significantly less restrictive of associational freedoms"
Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation
538 U.S. 188 (2003) Cited 244 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim for racial discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires proof of a racially discriminatory intent or purpose
Draper v. Coombs
792 F.2d 915 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 969 times
Holding that denying a motion to compel discovery was not an abuse of discretion even while treating a pro se plaintiff "with great leniency"
Washington v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1
458 U.S. 457 (1982) Cited 194 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding unconstitutional the state initiative that blocked the Seattle School District's use of mandatory busing to remedy de facto segregation
Watts v. S.E.C
482 F.3d 501 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 158 times
Holding that Section 25 is a direct-review provision that “specifically gives the courts of appeals subject-matter jurisdiction to directly review ... SEC ‘orders.’ ”
South Dakota Farm Bureau Inc. v. Hazeltine
340 F.3d 583 (8th Cir. 2003) Cited 82 times
Holding that companies that lost business as a result of a law that discriminated against out-of-state entities had standing, even though the law did not discriminate against the plaintiffs
Strauss v. Horton
46 Cal.4th 364 (Cal. 2009) Cited 67 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that married couples' rights vest upon a lawful marriage
Dart Industries Co. v. Westwood Chemical Co.
649 F.2d 646 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 134 times
Noting the necessity of broad restrictions "when a nonparty is the target of discovery"
Hecht v. Harris, Upham Co.
430 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir. 1970) Cited 152 times
Finding actual damages from churning to be both excess commissions and trading losses, but refusing to grant recovery for trading losses due to waiver and estoppel
Bates v. Jones
131 F.3d 843 (9th Cir. 1997) Cited 53 times
Upholding Proposition 140 against federal challenges
Rule 4 - Summons
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Cited 71,368 times 127 Legal Analyses
Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
Rule 45 - Subpoena
Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 Cited 17,099 times 110 Legal Analyses
Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"

Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

17 Cited authorities

Holding that infringement of the right to associate "may be justified by regulations adopted to serve compelling state interests, unrelated to the suppression of ideas, that cannot be achieved through means significantly less restrictive of associational freedoms"

Holding that a claim for racial discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires proof of a racially discriminatory intent or purpose

Holding that denying a motion to compel discovery was not an abuse of discretion even while treating a pro se plaintiff "with great leniency"

Holding unconstitutional the state initiative that blocked the Seattle School District's use of mandatory busing to remedy de facto segregation

Holding that Section 25 is a direct-review provision that “specifically gives the courts of appeals subject-matter jurisdiction to directly review ... SEC ‘orders.’ ”

Holding that companies that lost business as a result of a law that discriminated against out-of-state entities had standing, even though the law did not discriminate against the plaintiffs

Holding that married couples' rights vest upon a lawful marriage

Noting the necessity of broad restrictions "when a nonparty is the target of discovery"

Finding actual damages from churning to be both excess commissions and trading losses, but refusing to grant recovery for trading losses due to waiver and estoppel

Upholding Proposition 140 against federal challenges

Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"