33 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 235,923 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Adickes v. Kress Co.

    398 U.S. 144 (1970)   Cited 25,015 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a private person who conspires with government actors to deprive a plaintiff of her constitutional rights acts "under color of law" for purposes of § 1983
  3. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless

    509 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 2,253 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that speculative testimony is insufficient to defeat summary judgment
  4. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    29 Cal.4th 1134 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,653 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff cannot recover damages under Cal. Bus. Prof. Code § 17200 unless plaintiff has "an ownership interest in the money it seeks to recover"
  5. In re Tobacco II Cases

    46 Cal.4th 298 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 1,202 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding class representatives had standing to challenge common marketing of cigarettes despite differences in the advertisements or statements on which class members relied
  6. Furnace v. Paul Sullivan, Co.

    705 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2013)   Cited 850 times
    Holding that "the quantity of pepper spray discharged by the officers is unquestionably material, because the amount of force used is central to a claim sounding in the alleged use of excessive force."
  7. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.

    171 Cal.App.4th 1305 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 330 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that payment of extra money as a result of the defendant's action was sufficient for standing
  8. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.

    59 Cal.2d 57 (Cal. 1963)   Cited 868 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding a manufacturer's liability should be imposed irrespective of fault
  9. Casey v. Lewis

    4 F.3d 1516 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 323 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a class of prison inmates failed to establish that any named plaintiff suffered actual injury from a prison policy prohibiting HIV-positive individuals from obtaining employment in its food-service department because the class did not show that any named plaintiff was HIV-positive, was interested in a food-service job, or applied for one
  10. Sanders v. Apple Inc.

    672 F. Supp. 2d 978 (N.D. Cal. 2009)   Cited 172 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting motion to strike with leave to amend to define a narrower class
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,309 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 1760 - Liberal construction and application

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1760   Cited 151 times
    Stating the purpose of the CLRA is "to protect consumers against unfair and deceptive business practices"