§Why CasetextPricing

Perrin v. Papa John's International, Inc.

MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re MOTION to Compel and Show Cause

11 Cited authorities

  1. Zavala v. Wal Mart Stores Inc.

    691 F.3d 527 (3d Cir. 2012)   Cited 384 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the standard is whether the proposed collective plaintiffs are "similarly situated"

  2. Schoffstall v. Henderson

    223 F.3d 818 (8th Cir. 2000)   Cited 367 times
    Holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a Rule 59(e) motion which merely restated arguments made in opposition to summary judgment

  3. Nerland v. Caribou Coffee Co.

    564 F. Supp. 2d 1010 (D. Minn. 2007)   Cited 67 times
    Holding that evidence of a common policy of uniformly classifying employees as exempt and declining to pay overtime compensation where plaintiffs indicated they worked in excess of 40 hours per week "supports a finding of sufficient commonality between and among the plaintiffs to support collective adjudication of their misclassification claims."

  4. In re O'Brien

    351 F.3d 832 (8th Cir. 2003)   Cited 37 times
    Upholding the bankruptcy court's dismissal of a creditor's adversary proceeding due to repeated failures to obey order to appear for deposition

  5. Welsh v. Automatic Poultry Feeder Company

    439 F.2d 95 (8th Cir. 1971)   Cited 69 times

    No. 20454. March 9, 1971. John F. Angell, Minneapolis, Minn., Mahoney, Dougherty, Angell Mahoney, Richard P. Mahoney, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellants. Greer E. Lockhart and Jon D. Jensvold, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees; Richards, Montgomery, Cobb Bassford, Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel. Before GIBSON and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and McMANUS, Chief District Judge. McMANUS, Chief District Judge. This diversity action was dismissed below with prejudice for Appellants' repeated failure to comply

  6. Zanes v. Flagship Resort Dev., LLC

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3736 (D.N.J. Feb. 22, 2012)   Cited 10 times
    Finding two plaintiffs who worked for defendant company, one from "September 2008 through December 2008" and another from "August 2008 to November 2008," lacked the length of a typical employment relationship

  7. Arnold v. Directv, Inc.

    No. 4:10-CV-00352-JAR (E.D. Mo. Jul. 14, 2014)   Cited 2 times
    In Arnold, the Court had previously "ordered that Plaintiffs shall respondto the parties' discovery questionnaire no later than January 17, 2014, and serve their responses on Defendants no later than February 14, 2014."

  8. Zavala v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    Civil Action No. 03-5309 (JAG) (D.N.J. Sep. 25, 2008)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. 03-5309 (JAG). September 25, 2008 OPINION JOSEPH GREENAWAY JR., District Judge This action involves a wage and hour dispute filed by plaintiffs Victor Zavala, Eunice Zavala, Antonio Flores, Octavio Denisio, Hipolito Palacios, Carlos Alberto Tello, Maximiliano Mendez, Arturo Zavala, Filipe Condado, Luis Gutierrez, Daniel Antonio Crus, Petr Zednek, Teresa Jaros, Juri Pfauser, Hana Pfauserova, Pavel Kunc, and Martin Macak (collectively, the "Plaintiffs") against defendant Wal-Mart Stores

  9. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 45,850 times   319 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness

  10. Section 216 - Penalties

    29 U.S.C. § 216   Cited 16,347 times   140 Legal Analyses
    Holding employers liable for “unpaid minimum wages, or their unpaid overtime compensation”

  11. Section 206 - Minimum wage

    29 U.S.C. § 206   Cited 8,803 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”