26 Cited authorities

  1. Omni Capital Int'l v. Rudolf Wolff Co.

    484 U.S. 97 (1987)   Cited 1,931 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process concerns related to personal jurisdiction are alleviated where the defendant has consented to service
  2. Okla. Press Pub. Co. v. Walling

    327 U.S. 186 (1946)   Cited 812 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although agency must defend purpose behind investigation, it is not required to prove cause of action at subpoena enforcement stage
  3. Polycarpe v. E&S Landscaping Serv., Inc.

    616 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2010)   Cited 152 times
    Holding that plaintiff failed to prove "enterprise coverage," and that defendant was thus entitled to judgment as a matter of law, because plaintiff failed to introduce evidence sufficient to show that defendant's "annual gross volume of sales made or business done" was at least $500,000
  4. O'Meara v. Waters

    464 F. Supp. 2d 474 (D. Md. 2006)   Cited 149 times
    Holding that taxpayer had received due process because he was given the opportunity to participate in a telephone conference in which he discussed the substance of his case with an Appeals officer
  5. Blair v. City of Worcester

    522 F.3d 105 (1st Cir. 2008)   Cited 132 times
    Holding that the defendant's affidavits were sufficient to rebut the prima facie presumption created by a return of service
  6. Brennan v. Arnheim Neely, Inc.

    410 U.S. 512 (1973)   Cited 98 times
    Holding that the building management activities of the defendant constituted a "single enterprise" and, as such, should be aggregated for coverage purposes
  7. Martin v. Bedell

    955 F.2d 1029 (5th Cir. 1992)   Cited 160 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer of offshore cooks on oil rig maintenance boats was not exempted from enterprise coverage under the FLSA as the threshold sales volume was met
  8. Reich v. Gateway Press, Inc.

    13 F.3d 685 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 120 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that task of rewriting press releases, etc. did not meet artistic professional exemption in part because it did not "require any special imagination or skill at making a complicated thing seem simple"
  9. E.E.O.C. v. Karuk Tribe Housing Authority

    260 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 87 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding tribe not immune in EEOC enforcement action
  10. Reich v. Stewart

    121 F.3d 400 (8th Cir. 1997)   Cited 71 times
    Holding that a plaintiff cannot waive his entitlement to FLSA benefits
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 354,229 times   943 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 71,368 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
  13. Section 203 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 203   Cited 6,911 times   277 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "custom or practice" under a collective-bargaining agreement can make changing clothes noncompensable