6 Cited authorities

  1. Shingara v. Skiles

    420 F.3d 301 (3d Cir. 2005)   Cited 85 times
    Holding that "there is good cause [for a protective order under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26] when a party shows that disclosure will result in a clearly defined, specific and serious injury but that broad allegations of harm are not sufficient to establish good cause"
  2. United States v. Dentsply Intern., Inc.

    187 F.R.D. 152 (D. Del. 1999)   Cited 45 times
    Requiring government to provide facts in an interrogatory response
  3. JOINT STOCK SOCIETY v. UDV NORTH AMERICA, INC.

    Civil Action No. 95-749-GMS (D. Del. Jul. 11, 2000)   Cited 6 times
    Recognizing serious competitive injury if media, advertising, marketing, and promotional strategies released
  4. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 95,318 times   656 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  5. Rule 10 - Form of Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 10   Cited 19,544 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding exhibits attached to complaint may be treated as part of complaint for purposes of ruling on 12(b) motion
  6. Section 20.61 - Trade secrets and commercial or financial information which is privileged or confidential

    21 C.F.R. § 20.61   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining trade secret information and confidential commercial information