Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding the case exceptional where the defendant "advertised that its antifreeze met certain industry specifications" even though it "had never actually tested its antifreeze to determine whether it met [those] specifications"
367 Ill. App. 3d 287 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006) Cited 17 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Gredell, the plaintiff brought ICFA claims against a manufacturer and a distributor of certain pharmaceutical products, alleging that the defendants deceptively marketed and sold the products as an effective treatment for common cold symptoms when the defendants had no scientific evidence to support the drug's reported effects.