§Why CasetextPricing

Patti, et al v. Xerox Corp, et al

Reply in Support of 154 Response re Notice of Supplemental Authority & Cross-Notice of Supplemental Authority

2 Cited authorities

  1. In re Schering-Plough Corp. Erisa Litigation

    420 F.3d 231 (3d Cir. 2005)   Cited 66 times
    Holding that the Moench presumption of prudence does not apply to EIAPs that are only permitted, but not required, to invest in employer securities

  2. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 162,084 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."