30 Cited authorities

Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.
555 U.S. 7 (2008) Cited 16,785 times 56 Legal Analyses
Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"
Nken v. Holder
556 U.S. 418 (2009) Cited 3,292 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that "courts must be mindful that the Government's role as the respondent in every removal proceeding does not make the public interest in each individual one negligible"
Munaf v. Geren
553 U.S. 674 (2008) Cited 1,644 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that civilian U.S. citizens held in U.S. military custody in Iraq could petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. VCG Special Opportunities Master Fund Ltd.
598 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 2010) Cited 569 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "our venerable standard for assessing a movant's probability of success on the merits remains valid [after the Supreme Court's decision in Winter]"
Wisconsin Gas Co. v. F.E.R.C
758 F.2d 669 (D.C. Cir. 1985) Cited 648 times
Holding that to establish irreparable harm the movant must "substantiate the claim that irreparable injury is 'likely' to occur. . . . Bare allegations of what is likely to occur are of no value."
Washington Metro. Area, Etc. v. Holiday Tours
559 F.2d 841 (D.C. Cir. 1977) Cited 742 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that, "[w]ithout such a substantial indication of probable success, there would be no justification for the court's intrusion into the ordinary processes of administration and judicial review"
Davenport v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
166 F.3d 356 (D.C. Cir. 1999) Cited 164 times
Holding that money damages could remedy the harm caused by increased working hours and decreased benefits
Cuomo v. United States Nuclear Reg. Com'n
772 F.2d 972 (D.C. Cir. 1985) Cited 192 times
Holding that company's decision to hire employees and purchase materials without assurance that the project would go forward, and the resulting economic harm to the company if the activity was stayed, were "self-imposed costs are not properly the subject of inquiry on a motion for stay"
1010 Potomac Assoc. v. Grocery Manufacturers
485 A.2d 199 (D.C. 1984) Cited 130 times
Holding that "the interpretation of an integrated contract is a question of law unless it depends on the credibility of extrinsic evidence or on a choice among reasonable inferences to be drawn from extrinsic evidence" (citing RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS § 212)
Muir v. Navy Fed. Credit Union
529 F.3d 1100 (D.C. Cir. 2008) Cited 57 times
Finding that an FDCPA plaintiff had sufficiently pleaded the causation element of constitutional standing with regard to a defendant debt collector by alleging that the debt collector and the plaintiff's credit union "worked in concert ... to convert [funds] from the Plaintiff's Account" (alteration in original) (quoting the plaintiff's complaint)
Section 1691 - Scope of prohibition
15 U.S.C. § 1691 Cited 1,693 times 55 Legal Analyses
Providing that it is unlawful "for any creditor to discriminate against any applicant, with respect to any aspect of a credit transaction . . . because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public assistance program"
Section 202.7 - Rules concerning extensions of credit
12 C.F.R. § 202.7 Cited 164 times 2 Legal Analyses
Confirming that with regard to "secured credit, a creditor may require the signature of the applicant's spouse ... on any instrument necessary, or reasonably believed by the creditor to be necessary ... to make the property being offered as security available to satisfy the debt in the event of a default, for example, an instrument to create a valid lien, pass clear title, waive inchoate rights, or assign earnings"

Patriot-BSP City Center II, LLC et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al

30 Cited authorities

Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"

Holding that "courts must be mindful that the Government's role as the respondent in every removal proceeding does not make the public interest in each individual one negligible"

Holding that civilian U.S. citizens held in U.S. military custody in Iraq could petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court

Holding that "our venerable standard for assessing a movant's probability of success on the merits remains valid [after the Supreme Court's decision in Winter]"

Holding that to establish irreparable harm the movant must "substantiate the claim that irreparable injury is 'likely' to occur. . . . Bare allegations of what is likely to occur are of no value."

Holding that, "[w]ithout such a substantial indication of probable success, there would be no justification for the court's intrusion into the ordinary processes of administration and judicial review"

Holding that money damages could remedy the harm caused by increased working hours and decreased benefits

Holding that company's decision to hire employees and purchase materials without assurance that the project would go forward, and the resulting economic harm to the company if the activity was stayed, were "self-imposed costs are not properly the subject of inquiry on a motion for stay"

Holding that "the interpretation of an integrated contract is a question of law unless it depends on the credibility of extrinsic evidence or on a choice among reasonable inferences to be drawn from extrinsic evidence" (citing RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS § 212)

Providing that it is unlawful "for any creditor to discriminate against any applicant, with respect to any aspect of a credit transaction . . . because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public assistance program"