§Why CasetextPricing

Patel v. Facebook, Inc.

MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

32 Cited authorities

  1. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins

    578 U.S. 330 (2016)   Cited 7,390 times   437 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statutory violation, without more, did not give rise to Article III standing

  2. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,806 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

  3. Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA

    568 U.S. 398 (2013)   Cited 3,044 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that respondents could not establish injury by relying on a "speculative chain of possibilities"

  4. Vermont Agency of Nat. Res. v. U.S. ex rel. Stevens

    529 U.S. 765 (2000)   Cited 1,597 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that States are not subject to private FCA actions

  5. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah

    508 U.S. 520 (1993)   Cited 1,537 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements by city council, including asking: "[w]hat can we do to prevent the Church from opening?" to show animus

  6. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.

    554 U.S. 269 (2008)   Cited 782 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal cause of action that permitted payphone operators to seek compensation from long-distance carriers for certain calls was assignable

  7. Pleasant Grove City v. Summum

    555 U.S. 460 (2009)   Cited 660 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a government adopted donated monument because it "took ownership of that monument and put it on permanent display in a park that it owns and manages"

  8. Doe v. Chao

    540 U.S. 614 (2004)   Cited 483 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding a plaintiff must prove causation in order to obtain damages

  9. Greer v. Ill. Housing Dev. Authority

    122 Ill. 2d 462 (Ill. 1988)   Cited 362 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in Illinois, lack of standing is an affirmative defense, and contrasting Illinois with federal courts "where lack of article III (U.S. Const., art. III) standing is a bar to jurisdiction"

  10. Lee v. American Nat. Ins. Co.

    260 F.3d 997 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 219 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an uninjured plaintiff who may have had a state cause of action under the UCL was "foreclosed from litigating the same cause of action in federal court, [because] he cannot demonstrate the requisite injury"

  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,449 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  12. Section 1681 - Congressional findings and statement of purpose

    15 U.S.C. § 1681   Cited 6,292 times   190 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the need to protect "the consumer's right to privacy"

  13. Section 740 ILCS 14/15 - Retention; Collection; Disclosure; Destruction

    740 ILCS 14/15   Cited 210 times   68 Legal Analyses
    Requiring “private entit[ies]” to comply with BIPA provisions

  14. Section 740 ILCS 14/20 - Right of Action

    740 ILCS 14/20   Cited 98 times   53 Legal Analyses
    Providing that successful plaintiffs may recover the higher of actual damages or liquidated damages of $1,000 for a negligent violation and $5,000 for a willful violation