12 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,709 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,625 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Conley v. Gibson

    355 U.S. 41 (1957)   Cited 58,505 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief"
  4. Brooks v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

    116 F.3d 1364 (11th Cir. 1997)   Cited 1,906 times
    Holding that employees "who have not suffered an injury in that they have been covered by Medicare for the medical care they have received retain a sufficient interest in this action for purposes of the Constitutional 'case or controversy' requirement"
  5. Lowrey v. Texas a M University System

    117 F.3d 242 (5th Cir. 1997)   Cited 1,337 times
    Holding that “title IX affords a private right of action for retaliation against the employees of federally funded educational institutions.”
  6. In re Seagate Technology

    497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 792 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an "advice of counsel" defense to willful infringement does not waive the attorney-client privilege as to trial counsel partly because post-filing conduct is usually not relevant to a finding of willful infringement
  7. Doe v. Myspace

    528 F.3d 413 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 762 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that CDA bars claims for negligence and gross negligence in not preventing a 13 year old girl from lying about her age to create a personal profile that led to contact by a sexual predator
  8. Kaiser Aluminum, Etc. v. Avondale Shipyards

    677 F.2d 1045 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 1,965 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, when a counterclaim showed that a contract was executed outside the limitations period, the "counterclaim on its face appears to reveal the existence of an affirmative defense to it, which would make the granting of a Rule 12(b) dismissal proper"
  9. McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp.

    501 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 410 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a direct infringement claim made in accordance with Form 16 (now Form 18) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure meets the Twombly pleading standard
  10. Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    781 F.2d 440 (5th Cir. 1986)   Cited 530 times
    Holding that non-customers do not, per se, lack standing to bring an action pursuant to Section 1975
  11. Section 271 - Infringement of patent

    35 U.S.C. § 271   Cited 6,040 times   1050 Legal Analyses
    Holding that testing is a "use"