42 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 260,142 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 273,590 times   368 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 28,570 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
  4. Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA

    568 U.S. 398 (2013)   Cited 3,232 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the absence of some independent existing or impending harm, plaintiffs "cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves"
  5. Summers v. Earth Island Inst.

    555 U.S. 488 (2009)   Cited 3,088 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that supplementation of the district court record to receive affidavits from the organization's members was not permitted "in the circumstances here: after the trial is over, judgment has been entered, and a notice of appeal has been filed"
  6. Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. Cuno

    547 U.S. 332 (2006)   Cited 2,776 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs did not have standing because their injury was " 'conjectural or hypothetical' in that it depend[ed] on how legislators respond[ed] to a reduction in revenue"
  7. Los Angeles v. Lyons

    461 U.S. 95 (1983)   Cited 7,657 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding there is no justiciable controversy where plaintiff had once been subjected to a chokehold
  8. Whitmore v. Arkansas

    495 U.S. 149 (1990)   Cited 2,908 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a third party does not have "standing to challenge the validity of a death sentence imposed on a capital defendant who has elected to forgo his right of appeal"
  9. City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n

    569 U.S. 290 (2013)   Cited 574 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Chevron applies to questions about the scope of an agency's statutory authority
  10. Cockrell v. Sparks

    510 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2007)   Cited 744 times
    Holding that an amendment is futile "when the complaint as amended would still be properly dismissed"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 354,229 times   943 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 160,289 times   196 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Section 1144 - Other laws

    29 U.S.C. § 1144   Cited 7,020 times   53 Legal Analyses
    Saving clause
  14. Section 12182 - Prohibition of discrimination by public accommodations

    42 U.S.C. § 12182   Cited 3,963 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that public accommodations cannot "directly or through contractual or other arrangements, utilize standards or criteria or methods of administration" that have the effect of discriminating on the basis of disability."
  15. Section 12181 - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 12181   Cited 3,529 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Including "grocery store" and "pharmac[ies]" whose operations "affect commerce" within the definition of "public accommodation"
  16. Section 12201 - Construction

    42 U.S.C. § 12201   Cited 762 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer has no duty to accommodate an employee it regards as disabled"
  17. Section 36.104 - Definitions

    28 C.F.R. § 36.104   Cited 396 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Enumerating factors to consider in the undue burden analysis