8 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,195 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  2. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 113,067 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,083 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, since the 58-year-old plaintiff was fired by his 60-year-old employer, there was an inference that "age discrimination was not the motive"
  4. Fuentes v. Perskie

    32 F.3d 759 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 3,763 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff can challenge a legitimate reason for an employment action by showing, inter alia, that the employer treated other, similarly situated persons not of her protected class more favorably
  5. Wishkin v. Potter

    476 F.3d 180 (3d Cir. 2007)   Cited 1,078 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding the statute applies to USPS employees
  6. Abramson v. William Paterson Coll. of N.J

    260 F.3d 265 (3d Cir. 2001)   Cited 1,176 times
    Holding that plaintiff produced sufficient evidence to preclude summary judgment where her supervisors' continued discriminatory comments demonstrated ongoing antagonism
  7. Bowers v. National

    475 F.3d 524 (3d Cir. 2007)   Cited 521 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Bowers stated a claim under Title II
  8. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,543 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit