MOTION for Summary Judgment Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Pre-Accident Release of Liability Howard G. McPherson appearing for Plaintiffs Sara Spreen, Mary M Strickert
516 U.S. 199 (1996) Cited 540 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that, under the differently worded provisions of § 1292(b), the entirety of the "order" that is certified for interlocutory appeal is reviewable on the ensuing appeal, including even portions of the order that do not involve the certified question that supports interlocutory jurisdiction
Holding that a limitation on liability had not been reasonably communicated to the passengers by way of a blanket reference to the applicability of the Athens Convention as opposed to a more precise statement of the applicable monetary limit
Holding that where individual purchases passenger ticket through agent who obtains and safeguards ticket until immediately prior to boarding, and where individual does not allege that agent would have refused a request to view the ticket had one been made, individual is charged with notice of ticket provisions
Holding that unless a warranty expressly disclaims liability for negligence, the plaintiff may recover his damages for negligent design and manufacture even though the only physical damage is to the product itself
Recognizing that courts will enforce red letter clauses if "the contractual language at issue is clear and unequivocal and clearly indicates the intentions of the parties"
Stating that "maritime law provides that construction of a maritime contract should not "lead to ... absurd consequences" (quoting Chembulk Trading , 393 F.3d at 555 n.6 )
Defining liability in subsection for “negligent acts or omissions of the person which cause injury, ” and qualifying that liability-i.e., no duty or breach-with a waiver exception in subsection (b)