31 Cited authorities

  1. Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty.

    693 F.3d 896 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 7,726 times
    Holding that "claims [that are] voluntarily dismissed" are "waived if not repled" in an amended complaint"
  2. Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.

    114 F.3d 1467 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 2,948 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs could not recover under § 1132 because they “[had] already won a judgment for damages under section 1132 for the injuries they suffered as a result of the defendant's actions”
  3. Avalos v. Baca

    596 F.3d 583 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 358 times
    Upholding dismissal of conspiracy claim where underlying constitutional claim was denied
  4. Howard v. America Online Inc.

    208 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 389 times
    Holding that the RICO bar applies even where the plaintiff does not have standing to sue under securities laws because the plaintiff did not buy or sell securities
  5. Young v. Young

    164 Wn. 2d 477 (Wash. 2008)   Cited 300 times
    Reciting the elements of Washington State unjust enrichment claims
  6. Indoor Billboard/Washington, Inc. v. Integra Telecom of Washington, Inc.

    162 Wn. 2d 59 (Wash. 2007)   Cited 267 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to satisfy the causation element, a CPA plaintiff must "establish that but for the defendant's unfair or deceptive act or practice the plaintiff's injury would not have occurred"
  7. U.S. v. Morales

    108 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 315 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a non-constitutional error is harmless if "it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect the verdict"
  8. Oscar v. University Students Co-op. Ass'n

    965 F.2d 783 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 297 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff could not recover for "personal discomfort and annoyance" under RICO
  9. Scott v. Trans-Sys

    148 Wn. 2d 701 (Wash. 2003)   Cited 79 times
    Holding that judicial dissolution of a corporation is a drastic remedy and a court should consider whether that solution will be beneficial or detrimental to shareholders or injurious to the public
  10. U.S. v. Dischner

    960 F.2d 870 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 100 times
    Finding three years to be a "substantial period of time" for a bribery scheme
  11. Section 1962 - Prohibited activities

    18 U.S.C. § 1962   Cited 15,961 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Specifying prohibited activities
  12. Section 1951 - Interference with commerce by threats or violence

    18 U.S.C. § 1951   Cited 11,676 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Defining extortion in ACCA as “the obtaining of something of value from another, with his consent, induced by the wrongful use or threatened use of force against the person or property of another ”
  13. Section 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

    18 U.S.C. § 1512   Cited 4,376 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Defining "law enforcement officer" as "an officer or employee of the Federal Government "
  14. Section 9A.04.110 - Definitions

    Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.04.110   Cited 815 times
    Defining "bodily injury" and "physical injury" as "physical pain or injury, illness, or an impairment of physical condition"
  15. Section 1515 - Definitions for certain provisions; general provision

    18 U.S.C. § 1515   Cited 332 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Defining "corruptly . . . [a]s used in section 1505"
  16. Section 9A.72.110 - Intimidating a witness

    Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.72.110   Cited 95 times
    Intimidating a witness
  17. Section 9A.56.110 - Extortion-Definition

    Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.56.110   Cited 45 times

    "Extortion" means knowingly to obtain or attempt to obtain by threat property or services of the owner, and specifically includes sexual favors. RCW 9A.56.110 1999 c 143 § 37; 1983 1st ex.s. c 4 § 2; 1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 38 § 10. Prior: 1975 1st ex.s. c 260 § 9A.56.110. Severability-1983 1st ex.s. c 4: See note following RCW 9A.48.070. Effective date-Severability-1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 38: See notes following RCW 9A.08.020.