25 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 255,413 times   280 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 269,161 times   367 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Tannenbaum v. U.S.

    148 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 1998)   Cited 2,780 times
    Holding that pro se pleadings "are held to a less stringent standard than pleadings drafted by attorneys and will, therefore, be liberally construed"
  4. Hughes v. Lott

    350 F.3d 1157 (11th Cir. 2003)   Cited 1,606 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because the "circumstances surrounding Hughes's convictions for burglary and receipt of stolen property are unknown from the record . . . [i]t was impossible . . . for the district court to determine that a successful § 1983 action for unreasonable search and seizure necessarily implied the invalidity of those convictions
  5. Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc.

    253 F.3d 678 (11th Cir. 2001)   Cited 930 times
    Holding complaint must "contain inferential allegations from which [the court] can identify each of the material elements necessary to sustain a recovery"
  6. Anderson v. District Board of Trustees of Central Florida Community College

    77 F.3d 364 (11th Cir. 1996)   Cited 908 times
    Holding that plaintiffs are required to "present each claim for relief in a separate count" rather than asserting numerous claims within a single count
  7. Thaeter v. Palm Beach Cty. Sheriff's Office

    449 F.3d 1342 (11th Cir. 2006)   Cited 367 times
    In Thaeter, the Eleventh Circuit found that the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office's (“PCBSO”) off-duty employment screening provision was not unconstitutionally vague.
  8. Lampkin-Asam v. Volusia County School Board

    261 F. App'x 274 (11th Cir. 2008)   Cited 225 times
    Holding that a pro se complaint which was "disjointed, repetitive, disorganized and barely comprehensible" was correctly dismissed because such a pleading did not articulate claims with sufficient clarity to allow defendant to frame a responsive pleading
  9. Fikes v. City of Daphne

    79 F.3d 1079 (11th Cir. 1996)   Cited 277 times
    Holding that "the question of whether police officers are properly performing their duties, as a public safety issue, must be considered an issue of political or social concern"
  10. Williams v. Fulton Cnty. Sch. Dist.

    181 F. Supp. 3d 1089 (N.D. Ga. 2016)   Cited 45 times
    Holding that plaintiff stated a § 1983 supervisory liability claim against principal where complaint alleged facts suggesting that principal knew offending teacher was "harming disabled students for three years and did nothing about it — or worse, took actions that may have condoned or encouraged it"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 348,708 times   930 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 157,731 times   196 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Rule 10 - Form of Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 10   Cited 19,706 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding exhibits attached to complaint may be treated as part of complaint for purposes of ruling on 12(b) motion
  14. Section 12112 - Discrimination

    42 U.S.C. § 12112   Cited 13,600 times   159 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing failure to accommodate as form of discrimination
  15. Section 794 - Nondiscrimination under Federal grants and programs

    29 U.S.C. § 794   Cited 12,391 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Adopting ADA standards for Rehabilitation Act claims