§Why CasetextPricing

Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries v. Oswego Lender, LLC et al

Memorandum in Support of Unopposed Motion to Intervene.

18 Cited authorities

  1. Trbovich v. Mine Workers

    404 U.S. 528 (1972)   Cited 898 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union member's interest was not adequately represented by the Secretary of Labor because the Secretary had a "duty to serve two distinct interests, which are related, but not identical:" that of the individual union member and that of the general public

  2. San Jose Mercury News v. U.S. Dist. Court

    187 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 815 times
    Holding that to gain a protective order the party must make "particularized showing of good cause with respect to any individual document"

  3. Southwest Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Berg

    268 F.3d 810 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 418 times
    Holding that the court is to take facts alleged in the pleadings, motion, and supporting declarations as true for purposes of the motion to intervene

  4. Arakaki v. Cayetano

    324 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 399 times
    Holding that a prospective intervenor was “not permitted to inject new, unrelated issues into the pending litigation”

  5. Wilderness Soc. v. U.S. Forest Service

    630 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 287 times
    Holding that injury in an environmental litigation is met "by showing that group members have direct contact with the environmental subject matter threatened by the adverse decision" (quoting Idaho Farm Bureau Fed'n v. Babbitt , 58 F.3d 1392, 1398 (9th Cir. 1995) )

  6. Prete v. Bradbury

    438 F.3d 949 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 224 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding harmless erroneous grant of intervention

  7. California ex Rel. Lockyer v. U.S.

    450 F.3d 436 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that an applicant "must demonstrate a likelihood that the government will abandon or concede a potentially meritorious" position

  8. Sierra Club v. U.S.E.P.A

    995 F.2d 1478 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 191 times
    Holding that a decision on EPA's authority to issue NPDES permits might create precedent that would limit the City of Phoenix's future ability to sue EPA over Phoenix's own NPDES permits

  9. Spangler v. Pasadena City Bd. of Educ.

    552 F.2d 1326 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 188 times
    Finding that a district court may analyze the relationship between the plaintiff's action and the applicant's claims in deciding whether to exercise its discretion to grant intervention

  10. Venegas v. Skaggs

    867 F.2d 527 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 104 times
    Holding that a court may consider whether the proposed intervenor's interests are already adequately represented in exercising the court's discretion

  11. Rule 24 - Intervention

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 24   Cited 9,214 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Granting the right of intervention to qualifying persons "unless existing parties adequately represent" them

  12. Section 3612 - Enforcement by Secretary

    42 U.S.C. § 3612   Cited 565 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing fee entitlement only for "plaintiffs"

  13. Section 659A.421 - Discrimination in selling, renting or leasing real property prohibited

    ORS § 659A.421   Cited 16 times
    Prohibiting discrimination in real estate transactions