166 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 263,477 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 276,716 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.

    511 U.S. 244 (1994)   Cited 3,859 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr

    518 U.S. 470 (1996)   Cited 2,451 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the presence of a state-law damages remedy for violations of FDA requirements does not impose an additional requirement upon medical device manufacturers but "merely provides another reason for manufacturers to comply with . . . federal law"
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v St. Cyr

    533 U.S. 289 (2001)   Cited 1,449 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that title of provision, "Elimination of Custody Review by Habeas Corpus," along with broad statement of intent to preclude review, was not sufficient to bar review of habeas corpus petitions
  6. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.

    552 U.S. 312 (2008)   Cited 1,051 times   62 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a State’s “‘requirements’” “includ[e] [the state’s] common-law duties”
  7. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

    376 U.S. 254 (1964)   Cited 6,996 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice
  8. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.

    418 U.S. 323 (1974)   Cited 3,918 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a private defamation plaintiff cannot recover punitive damages without proving actual malice
  9. Greenlaw v. United States

    554 U.S. 237 (2008)   Cited 824 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court of appeals may not impose sua sponte a mandatory-minimum prison term, when errantly omitted from the sentence, absent the government's cross-appeal
  10. Corley v. United States

    556 U.S. 303 (2009)   Cited 779 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "statute should be construed so that effect is given to all its provisions, so that no part will be inoperative or superfluous"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 357,835 times   950 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 162,084 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Section Amendment I - Religion and Expression

    U.S. Const. amend. I   Cited 7,346 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the "right to petition the Government for redress of grievances"
  14. Section 352 - Investigation by attorney-general

    N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352   Cited 221 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Observing that in such situations "a witness subpoenaed to appear * * * has no constitutional right to * * * counsel" [supra, at 65]
  15. Section 1707.43 - Remedies of purchaser in unlawful sale

    Ohio Rev. Code § 1707.43   Cited 159 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that every "participant" in the sale of unregistered securities is jointly and severally liable to the defrauded purchaser
  16. Section 1707.44 - Prohibited acts

    Ohio Rev. Code § 1707.44   Cited 131 times
    Prohibiting false representations in the sale of securities
  17. Section 1707.41 - Civil liability of seller for fraud

    Ohio Rev. Code § 1707.41   Cited 52 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Relying on written circular, prospectus, or advertisement and sustaining damages due to false material statement therein or omission of material facts
  18. Section 78o-7 - Registration of nationally recognized statistical rating organizations

    15 U.S.C. § 78o-7   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) Registration procedures (1) Application for registration (A) In general A credit rating agency that elects to be treated as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization for purposes of this chapter (in this section referred to as the "applicant"), shall furnish to the Commission an application for registration, in such form as the Commission shall require, by rule or regulation issued in accordance with subsection (n), and containing the information described in subparagraph (B). (B)

  19. Section 249b.300 - FORM NRSRO, application for registration as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization pursuant to section 15E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 240.17g-1 of this chapter

    17 C.F.R. § 249b.300

    This Form shall be used for an initial application for and an application to add a class of credit ratings to, a supplement to an initial application for and an application to add a class of credit ratings to, an update and amendment to an application for, and a withdrawal from a registration as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization pursuant to section 15E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o-7 ) and § 240.17g-1 of this chapter. 17 C.F.R. §249b.300 72 FR 33624,