§Why CasetextPricing

Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund et al v. Standard & Poor's Financial Services, LLC et al

Reply re the Ohio Funds' Response to Defendants' 57 Notice of Supplemental Authorities

2 Cited authorities

  1. In re Beacon Associates Litigation

    745 F. Supp. 2d 386 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)   Cited 77 times
    Holding that where a defendant “was under a duty to update or correct [a prior misrepresentation] ... Plaintiffs are entitled to the Affiliated Ute presumption of reliance on this omission”

  2. In re Wells Fargo Mortgage-Backed Certificates Litigation

    Case No.: 09-CV-01376-LHK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2010)

    Case No.: 09-CV-01376-LHK. October 5, 2010 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART WELLS FARGO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS LUCY KOH, District Judge On September 7, 2010, the Court heard oral argument on the Motions to Dismiss brought by Wells Fargo. Based on the parties' arguments and the papers submitted, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART Wells Fargo's Motion. Wells Fargo Bank, its parent company Wells Fargo Co., and the individual Defendants. I. BACKGROUND This putative class action