§Why CasetextPricing

O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

RESPONSE

61 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

    563 U.S. 333 (2011)   Cited 3,756 times   601 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"

  2. First Options of Chi., Inc. v. Kaplan

    514 U.S. 938 (1995)   Cited 5,351 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a circuit court reviewing a district court's disposition of an arbitration award should apply "ordinary, not special, standards."

  3. Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 83 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 1,745 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding unilateral arbitration provision substantively unconscionable

  4. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc.

    469 F.3d 1257 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 897 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that was invalid due to unconscionability was not enforceable

  5. Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co., LLC

    61 Cal.4th 899 (Cal. 2015)   Cited 327 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Concepcion applies to the Consumers Legal Remedies Act to the extent that it would have the same effect as Discover Bank

  6. Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.

    328 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 455 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a unilateral modification provision, which provided more notice than required in Ralphs' policy, was substantively unconscionable

  7. Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno

    57 Cal.4th 1109 (Cal. 2013)   Cited 317 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the FAA does not permit "additional delay that results from ... an administrative scheme [like the Berman hearing process] to effectuate state policies unrelated to the agreement's enforceability"

  8. Ting v. AT&T

    319 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 404 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an enforceable arbitration agreement contained an unconscionable fee-splitting provision

  9. Gentry v. Superior Court

    42 Cal.4th 443 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 348 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employee's signature on receipt of "issue resolution package," which included a 30-day opt-out provision of arbitration agreement, "reasonably led" his employer to believe "that his failure to opt out constituted acceptance of the arbitration agreement"

  10. Morrison v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.

    317 F.3d 646 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 360 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding unenforceable arbitration agreement that limited remedies under Title VII

  11. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 34,939 times   1234 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"

  12. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,271 times   80 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355