§Why CasetextPricing

O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

MOTION to Dismiss CAL. LABOR CODE § 2802 CLAIM AND PURSUE THE CLAIM THROUGH THE CA. BUS. PROF. CODE §§ 17200 AND TO BIFURCATE LIABILITY AND DAMAGES PROCEEDINGS

15 Cited authorities

  1. Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.

    23 Cal.4th 163 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 555 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding restitution is "the return of the excess of what the plaintiff gave the defendant over the value of what the plaintiff received"

  2. Amaral v. Cintas Corp.

    163 Cal.App.4th 1157 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 289 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employees working on public works projects had a private right of action under the California living wage ordinance

  3. Jimenez v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    765 F.3d 1161 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 174 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[p]roving at trial whether such informal or unofficial policies existed” would drive the resolution of class claims

  4. Kramer v. Banc of America Securities, LLC

    355 F.3d 961 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 231 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "compensatory and punitive damages are not available" on an ADA retaliation claim

  5. Alexander v. Fedex Ground Package Sys., Inc.

    765 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 76 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this factor favored an employment finding as the "FedEx drivers need no experience to get the job in the first place and only required skill is the ability to drive."

  6. People v. Toomey

    157 Cal.App.3d 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)   Cited 151 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a showing of threatened future harm or continuing violation is required" before a court can impose an injunction under California's Business and Professions Code

  7. Hodge v. Superior Court

    145 Cal.App.4th 278 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 54 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting remedies under the UCL are purely equitable, and, thus, there is no right to a jury trial on such a claim

  8. Bates v. United Parcel Service

    204 F.R.D. 440 (N.D. Cal. 2001)   Cited 61 times
    Certifying class of plaintiffs with hearing disabilities

  9. People v. First Federal Credit Corp.

    104 Cal.App.4th 721 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 35 times
    Discussing civil cases "making the defendant's financial inability to pay the penalty a matter for the defendant to raise in mitigation"

  10. Trosper v. Styker Corp.

    Case No.: 13-CV-0607-LHK (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2014)   Cited 11 times

    Case No.: 13-CV-0607-LHK 08-21-2014 TANNER TROSPER, on behalf of himself, individually, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. STYKER CORPORATION, HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF's MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Plaintiff Tanner Trosper ("Trosper") filed this putative class action against his former employers, Stryker Corporation ("Stryker") and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation ("Howmedica")

  11. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,846 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices

  12. Section 2802 - Indemnification for necessary expenditures and losses incurred in direct consequence of discharge of duties

    Cal. Lab. Code § 2802   Cited 1,084 times   122 Legal Analyses
    Pertaining to expense reimbursements

  13. Section 17203 - Injunctive relief

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17203   Cited 984 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that an individual plead that she lost "money or property" because of the alleged deceptive conduct