47 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 186,705 times   258 Legal Analyses
    Holding that government officials cannot be held liable for their subordinates' unconstitutional conduct under a theory of respondeat superior
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 203,552 times   340 Legal Analyses
    Holding that conclusory allegations that the defendants acted unlawfully were insufficient to state a claim
  3. GFF Corp. v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.

    130 F.3d 1381 (10th Cir. 1997)   Cited 1,276 times
    Holding failure to address district court's alternative ground for granting summary judgment compelled affirmance
  4. Rhino Linings USA, Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Rhino Lining, Inc.

    62 P.3d 142 (Colo. 2003)   Cited 205 times
    Finding that a developer's widespread advertisements of untrue facts had a significant public impact
  5. Llewellyn v. Allstate Home Loans, Inc.

    711 F.3d 1173 (10th Cir. 2013)   Cited 111 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that § 1692e is violated where "the debt collector knows of the dispute and elects to report it to a [Credit Reporting Agency]"
  6. Hall v. Walter

    969 P.2d 224 (Colo. 1998)   Cited 166 times
    Holding that, when certain requirements are met, non-consumers have standing to maintain privatecause of action under Colorado Consumer Protection Act
  7. Coors Brewing Co. v. Floyd

    978 P.2d 663 (Colo. 1999)   Cited 152 times
    Holding that extreme and outrageous conduct is that which is "so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community."
  8. Alpine Bank v. Hubbell

    555 F.3d 1097 (10th Cir. 2009)   Cited 107 times
    Finding no public impact where challenged statements were made to all potential borrowers but there was no evidence they impacted anyone beyond plaintiffs
  9. Coors v. Security Life of Denver Ins. Co.

    112 P.3d 59 (Colo. 2005)   Cited 108 times
    Finding an impact on less than one percent of the company's consuming public was not sufficiently significant to meet CCPA's requirements
  10. Mtg. Investments v. Battle Mountain

    70 P.3d 1176 (Colo. 2003)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that the six-year prescription in Section 103.5 governs a claim for a default on a promissory note
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 258,115 times   760 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1692 - Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

    15 U.S.C. § 1692   Cited 13,087 times   121 Legal Analyses
    Finding existing laws and procedures inadequate to protect consumers
  13. Section 1692k - Civil liability

    15 U.S.C. § 1692k   Cited 5,416 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing the grant of actual and statutory damages against "any debt collector who fails to comply with any provision of this subchapter"
  14. Section 1692g - Validation of debts

    15 U.S.C. § 1692g   Cited 2,970 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Setting forth requirements for disputing a debt
  15. Section 1692d - Harassment or abuse

    15 U.S.C. § 1692d   Cited 1,592 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Banning harassment or abuse "in connection with the collection of a debt"
  16. Section 1692c - Communication in connection with debt collection

    15 U.S.C. § 1692c   Cited 1,320 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Regulating communications with consumers
  17. Section 2614 - Jurisdiction of courts; limitations

    12 U.S.C. § 2614   Cited 1,169 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Granting RESPA jurisdiction to federal district courts and "any other court of competent jurisdiction"
  18. Section 13-80-102 - General limitation of actions - two years

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-102   Cited 307 times
    Providing the general limitation for personal injury claims in Colorado is two years from when the action accrues
  19. Section 13-80-103 - General limitation of actions - one year

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-103   Cited 62 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that "[a]ll actions for any penalty or forfeiture of any penal statutes" be commenced within one year after the action accrues
  20. Section 38-38-101 - Holder of evidence of debt may elect to foreclose

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 38-38-101   Cited 61 times
    Noting that the holder of an evidence of debt may assign the secured debt at any time during the pendency of a foreclosure action