§Why CasetextPricing

O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al

MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs

14 Cited authorities

  1. Blum v. Stenson

    465 U.S. 886 (1984)   Cited 8,863 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that fee shifting is “to be calculated according to the prevailing market rates in the relevant community, regardless of whether plaintiff is represented by private or nonprofit counsel”

  2. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

    468 U.S. 85 (1984)   Cited 666 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NCAA restrictions on televising college football games are subject to Rule of Reason analysis for the “critical” reason that “horizontal restraints on competition are essential if the product is to be available at all”

  3. Gates v. Deukmejian

    987 F.2d 1392 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 1,692 times
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by applying exception to the forum rule where local counsel were unavailable

  4. Morales v. City of San Rafael

    96 F.3d 359 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 833 times
    Determining that lodestar calculation may be adjusted upward or downward only on the basis of Johnson factors not already subsumed in lodestar determination

  5. Jordan v. Multnomah County

    815 F.2d 1258 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 723 times
    Holding that there is a strong presumption that the lodestar represents a reasonable fee

  6. Trustees of Const. v. Redland Ins. Co.

    460 F.3d 1253 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 236 times
    Holding that expenses that are not allowable as costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 may be awarded under ERISA as a component of reasonable attorneys' fees where it is "the prevailing practice in a given community" for lawyers to bill those costs separately from their hourly rates

  7. Cabrales v. County of Los Angeles

    864 F.2d 1454 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 214 times
    Holding that section 474 addresses a substantive state policy and as such is admissible in federal court

  8. Azizian v. Federated

    243 F. App'x 311 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 85 times
    Holding “that the term ‘costs on appeal’ in Rule 7 includes all expenses defined as ‘costs' by an applicable fee-shifting statute, including attorney's fees”

  9. Twin City Sportservice v. Charles O. Finley

    676 F.2d 1291 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 174 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that 24% foreclosure for an unreasonable length of time is substantial

  10. Yahoo!, Inc. v. Net Games, Inc.

    329 F. Supp. 2d 1179 (N.D. Cal. 2004)   Cited 44 times
    Finding 74.4 hours to be reasonable for trademark default judgment

  11. Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54   Cited 41,439 times   143 Legal Analyses
    Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"

  12. Section 26 - Injunctive relief for private parties; exception; costs

    15 U.S.C. § 26   Cited 1,457 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing injunctive relief against "threatened loss or damage by a violation of the antitrust laws"