9 Cited authorities

  1. Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.

    232 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 2,035 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allowing the plaintiffs to proceed with a new theory of liability at summary judgment after the close of discovery would prejudice the defendants
  2. Robertson v. Fleetwood Travel Inc.

    144 Cal.App.4th 785 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 169 times
    Concluding "that for purposes of the reimbursement remedy under section 1793.2, subdivision (d), the term ‘purchase price paid’ includes finance charges incurred in conjunction with the purchase"
  3. American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Superior Court

    37 Cal.App.4th 1291 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 183 times
    Holding that the implied warranty of merchantability can be breached only if a vehicle manifests a defect that is so basic it renders the vehicle unfit for its ordinary purpose of providing transportation
  4. Mocek v. Alfa Leisure, Inc.

    114 Cal.App.4th 402 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 132 times
    Affirming trial court's ruling "that, where the implied warranty of merchantability is breached, applicable statutes do not require a buyer to give the seller an opportunity to repair before rescinding the purchase" because "there is no requirement the seller be given an opportunity to repair when the implied warranty of merchantability is breached"
  5. United States v. Lopez-Menera

    542 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (N.D. Cal. 2008)   Cited 7 times
    Dismissing indictment for violation of § 1326 where IJ failed to inform defendant of eligibility for voluntary departure and defendant had plausible claim for voluntary departure
  6. Rule 32.1 - Citing Judicial Dispositions

    Fed. R. App. P. 32.1   Cited 34,472 times   152 Legal Analyses
    Permitting court to cite to unpublished federal judicial opinions
  7. Section 1790 - Title of act

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1790   Cited 694 times   6 Legal Analyses

    This chapter may be cited as the "Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act." Ca. Civ. Code § 1790 Added by Stats. 1970, Ch. 1333.

  8. Section 2607 - Effect of acceptance; notice of breach; burden of establishing breach after acceptance; notice of claim or litigation to person answerable over

    Cal. Com. Code § 2607   Cited 108 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that a buyer "must, within a reasonable time after he or she discovers or should have discovered any breach, notify the seller of the breach or be barred from any remedy"
  9. Section 1790.3 - Conflicts between Commercial Code and provisions of chapter

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1790.3   Cited 31 times

    The provisions of this chapter shall not affect the rights and obligations of parties determined by reference to the Commercial Code except that, where the provisions of the Commercial Code conflict with the rights guaranteed to buyers of consumer goods under the provisions of this chapter, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. Ca. Civ. Code § 1790.3 Added by Stats. 1970, Ch. 1333.