§Why CasetextPricing

Nucor Steel-Arkansas et al v. Pruitt

Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment

50 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 28,052 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

  2. Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA

    568 U.S. 398 (2013)   Cited 3,109 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that respondents could not establish injury by relying on a "speculative chain of possibilities"

  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation

    497 U.S. 871 (1990)   Cited 9,574 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to admit affidavits in support of standing when filed after summary judgment briefing and hearing were complete

  4. List v. Driehaus

    573 U.S. 149 (2014)   Cited 2,005 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state government's credible threat of prosecting the plaintiffs under a statute criminalizing false statements about candidates during a political campaign established standing in a facial pre-enforcement challenge

  5. Hunt v. Washington Apple Advertising Comm'n

    432 U.S. 333 (1977)   Cited 4,455 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that North Carolina's statute banning state grading of apples was discriminatory even though six other states also had no state grading

  6. Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo

    456 U.S. 305 (1982)   Cited 1,774 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Federal Water Pollution Control Act did not mandate injunctions against its violation

  7. Alaska Dept. of E. C. P. A. v. E. P. A.

    540 U.S. 461 (2004)   Cited 540 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the EPA could overrule the state agency's construction of the term “best available control technology” in the Clean Air Act”

  8. Winston & Strawn, LLP v. McLean

    843 F.3d 503 (D.C. Cir. 2016)   Cited 238 times
    Holding that "a motion for summary judgment" pursuant to FRCP 56 can never "be deemed ‘conceded’ " pursuant to Local Rule 7(b) "for want of opposition"

  9. Catawba Cty. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency

    571 F.3d 20 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 133 times
    Holding that petitioners waived two statutory arguments by failing to raise them in opening briefs

  10. Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

    446 F.3d 808 (8th Cir. 2006)   Cited 143 times
    Holding that, for purposes of a NEPA claim under the APA, a FONSI is a final agency action permitting immediate judicial review as long as plaintiffs are able to point to an action “at least arguably triggering the agency's obligation to prepare an impact statement”

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,940 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Section 7604 - Citizen suits

    42 U.S.C. § 7604   Cited 867 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts limited jurisdiction "to compel (consistent with paragraph (2) of this section) agency action unreasonably delayed ..."

  13. Section 7607 - Administrative proceedings and judicial review

    42 U.S.C. § 7607   Cited 786 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Granting the D.C. Circuit original jurisdiction to review "any other nationally applicable regulations promulgated, or final action taken, by the Administrator under this chapter" and granting regional circuits jurisdiction to review "any other final action of the Administrator under this chapter ... which is locally or regionally applicable"

  14. Section 7410 - State implementation plans for national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards

    42 U.S.C. § 7410   Cited 654 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Granting EPA the discretion to revoke a State's air permitting authority if the EPA "disapproves a State implementation plan submission in whole or in part"

  15. Section 7409 - National primary and secondary ambient air quality standards

    42 U.S.C. § 7409   Cited 414 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting a cost/benefit analysis by preventing the EPA from considering any factor other than health effects relating to pollutants in the air in establishing NAAQS for ozone and particulate matter

  16. Section 7407 - Air quality control regions

    42 U.S.C. § 7407   Cited 314 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, § 103, Pub.L. No. 95-95, 91 Stat. 685, 687-88

  17. Section 7475 - Preconstruction requirements

    42 U.S.C. § 7475   Cited 231 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Requiring permits for "the construction and operation" of certain facilities

  18. Section 7470 - Congressional declaration of purpose

    42 U.S.C. § 7470   Cited 187 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Stating the purpose of the PSD program is "to protect public health and welfare from any actual or potential adverse effect . . . from air pollution"

  19. Section 7479 - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 7479   Cited 156 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining "construction" to include "modification"

  20. Section 7501 - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 7501   Cited 113 times
    Defining LAER

  21. Section 51.166 - Prevention of significant deterioration of air quality

    40 C.F.R. § 51.166   Cited 68 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Repeating statutory definition

  22. Section 50.6 - National primary and secondary ambient air quality standards for PM[10]

    40 C.F.R. § 50.6   Cited 41 times
    Establishing the NAAQS for large particulate matter, setting attainment to be exceeding a 24-hour average concentration of 150 µg/m3 no more than one day within a calendar year

  23. Section 51.308 - Regional haze program requirements

    40 C.F.R. § 51.308   Cited 31 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Directing a state to "submit an implementation plan . . . representing BART . . . for each BART-eligible source"

  24. Section 70.2 - Definitions

    40 C.F.R. § 70.2   Cited 25 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Defining "major source"

  25. Section 50.7 - National primary and secondary ambient air quality standards for PM[2.5]

    40 C.F.R. § 50.7   Cited 22 times

    (a) The national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards for particulate matter are 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter ([MICRO]g/m3) annual arithmetic mean concentration, and 65 [MICRO]g/m3 24-hour average concentration measured in the ambient air as PM2.5 (particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5 micrometers) by either: (1) A reference method based on appendix L of this part and designated in accordance with part 53 of this chapter; or (2) An equivalent

  26. Section 70.8 - Permit review by EPA and affected States

    40 C.F.R. § 70.8   Cited 11 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Allowing for petitions to EPA to object to issuance of permits by states

  27. Section 52.181 - Significant deterioration of air quality

    40 C.F.R. § 52.181   Cited 1 times

    (a) The plan submitted by the Governor of Arkansas as follows: (1) April 23, 1981-submittal of the PSD Supplement Arkansas Plan of Implementation for Pollution Control (the "PSD Supplement") submitted April 23, 1981 (as adopted by the Arkansas Commission on Pollution Control and Ecology (ACPCE) on April 10, 1981); (2) June 3, 1988-submittal of revisions to the PSD Supplement (revised and adopted by the ACPCE on March 25, 1988); (3) June 19, 1990-submittal of revisions to the PSD Supplement (revised