5 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 260,621 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 274,046 times   368 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA

    568 U.S. 398 (2013)   Cited 3,245 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the absence of some independent existing or impending harm, plaintiffs "cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves"
  4. Resnick v. Avmed, Inc.

    693 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2012)   Cited 455 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs need only allege losses, not unreimbursed losses, for a cognizable injury in a Florida breach of implied contract claim
  5. Reilly v. Ceridian Corp.

    664 F.3d 38 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 217 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding purported injury in fact was too conjectural where "we cannot now describe how Appellants will be injured in this case without beginning our explanation with the word ‘if’ "