12 Cited authorities

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America

    511 U.S. 375 (1994)   Cited 18,963 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that absent a reservation of jurisdiction in the stipulated dismissal order, federal courts lack jurisdiction to consider enforcement of a settlement agreement
  2. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.

    975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 6,183 times
    Holding the "good cause" standard of Rule 16 controls after a scheduling order establishes the pleading timetable
  3. Holy Land Foundation v. Ashcroft

    333 F.3d 156 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 364 times
    Holding that when the failure results in no prejudice to the nonmoving party, "we find error to be harmless."
  4. Rutman Wine Co. v. E. J. Gallo Winery

    829 F.2d 729 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 411 times
    Holding district court's denial of leave to amend appropriate where the identified defects in prior order were not cured in amended complaint
  5. Ministerio Roca Solida v. U.S. Dep't of Fish & Wildlife

    2:12-cv-01488-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2013)   Cited 162 times
    Finding claims for declaratory and injunctive relief premised upon the Little Tucker Act are impliedly prohibited
  6. Goraya v. Martinez

    2:15-cv-2375-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2015)   Cited 9 times

    2:15-cv-2375-JAM-KJN 11-17-2015 MANJIT SINGH GORAYA, Plaintiff, v. HUGA F. MARTINEZ; NORMA MARTINEZ; CELIA DOMIONQUEZ; DOES 1-10, Defendant(s). John A. Mendez, United States District Judge SUA SPONTE ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT The undersigned revokes any actual or anticipated referral to a Magistrate Judge for the purposes of Findings and Recommendations in this case. See Local Rule 302(d) ("Notwithstanding any other provision of this Rule, a Judge may retain any matter otherwise routinely

  7. Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. Salazar

    624 F. Supp. 2d 103 (D.D.C. 2009)   Cited 14 times
    Applying APA standard to claims under both the APA and the ISDEAA and where parties apparently had not raised the Indian canon
  8. Southcentral Found. v. Roubideaux

    48 F. Supp. 3d 1291 (D. Alaska 2014)

    No. 3:13–cv–00164–SLG. 09-23-2014 SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION, an Alaskan corporation, Plaintiff, v. Yvette ROUBIDEAUX, Director, U.S. Indian Health Service, Defendant. Lloyd B. Miller, Sonosky, Chambers, Sachse, Miller & Munson, LLP, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff. Richard L. Pomeroy, U.S. Attorney's Office, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant. SHARON L. GLEASON, District Judge. Lloyd B. Miller, Sonosky, Chambers, Sachse, Miller & Munson, LLP, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff. Richard L. Pomeroy, U.S. Attorney's

  9. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,620 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  10. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 94,872 times   653 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  11. Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 16   Cited 33,677 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)
  12. Section 450 - Transferred

    25 U.S.C. § 450   Cited 284 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Proclaiming that "prolonged Federal domination . . . has served to retard rather than enhance the progress of Indian people and their communities by depriving Indians of the full opportunity to develop leadership skills crucial to the realization of self government"