§Why CasetextPricing

Nolan v. Trans Union Llc et al

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction UMASSFIVE COLLEGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE

17 Cited authorities

  1. Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz

    471 U.S. 462 (1985)   Cited 17,150 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.

  2. Helicopteros Nacionales de Colom. v. Hall

    466 U.S. 408 (1984)   Cited 9,391 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “purchases, even if occurring at regular intervals” were insufficient to establish general personal jurisdiction over a nonresident corporation

  3. Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington

    326 U.S. 310 (1945)   Cited 22,953 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Holding that states may exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants with "certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ " (quoting Milliken v. Meyer , 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940) )

  4. Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.

    374 F.3d 797 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 2,771 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the tort context, "[t]he `express aiming' analysis depends, to a significant degree, on the specific type of tort or other wrongful conduct at issue"

  5. Boschetto v. Hansing

    539 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 1,234 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the lone transaction for the sale of one item" did not create personal jurisdiction over the defendants in California because there were no allegations that the seller was a regular user of eBay to sell cars or "as a broader vehicle for commercial activity"

  6. Pebble Beach Co. v. Caddy

    453 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 1,062 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court "need not permit even limited discovery" where a "plaintiff's claim of personal jurisdiction appears to be both attenuated and based on bare allegations in the face of specific denials made by the defendants"

  7. Bancroft Masters, Inc., v. Augusta National

    223 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,233 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that California had personal jurisdiction over declaratory judgment defendant because of defendant's challenge to plaintiff's registration for its domain name, which challenge was filed with an agency located in Virginia but affected the plaintiff's ability to use the domain name in California

  8. Dole Food Co. v. Watts

    303 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,096 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because purposeful direction was established, it was "obvious" that the second prong of the minimum contacts test was also satisfied

  9. Doe v. Unocal Corp.

    248 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 948 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "court may consider evidence" on motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)

  10. Harris Rutsky Co. v. Bell Clements

    328 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 836 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "100% control through stock ownership" and "shar[ing] the same offices . . . and some of the same staff" did not make one company the alter ego of the other

  11. Section 12-341.01 - Recovery of attorney fees

    Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-341.01   Cited 2,648 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Permitting an award of reasonable attorney's fees to the successful party in a contested action arising out of express or implied contract