Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006) Cited 5,948 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that "[t]hose who seek to maintain the secrecy of documents attached to dispositive motions must meet the high threshold of showing that compelling reasons support secrecy"
Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
331 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 3,420 timesHolding that the Phillips exception is "expressly limited to the status of materials . . . attached to a non-dispositive motion"
Phillips v. General Motors Corp.
307 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2002) Cited 2,266 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the party or intervenor “seeking protection bears the burden of showing specific prejudice or harm will result if no protective order is granted”
United States v. De La Jara
973 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1992) Cited 108 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding defendant waived attorney-client privilege when he made no attempt to assert privilege for six months
In re Grand Jury Invest. of Ocean Transp
604 F.2d 672 (D.C. Cir. 1979) Cited 72 timesHolding that, because the district court's order "conclusively determined the question of waiver" of the attorney-client privilege, appellant "must pursue its claim of attorney-client privilege at this time in order to ensure that its claim not later become moot by reason of the documents' disclosure to third parties"
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 22,480 times 16 Legal AnalysesAllowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system