6 Cited authorities

  1. Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu

    447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 5,776 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]hose who seek to maintain the secrecy of documents attached to dispositive motions must meet the high threshold of showing that compelling reasons support secrecy"
  2. Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    331 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 3,331 times
    Holding that the Phillips exception is "expressly limited to the status of materials . . . attached to a non-dispositive motion"
  3. Phillips v. General Motors Corp.

    307 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 2,224 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the party or intervenor “seeking protection bears the burden of showing specific prejudice or harm will result if no protective order is granted”
  4. United States v. De La Jara

    973 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 108 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding defendant waived attorney-client privilege when he made no attempt to assert privilege for six months
  5. In re Grand Jury Invest. of Ocean Transp

    604 F.2d 672 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 72 times
    Holding that, because the district court's order "conclusively determined the question of waiver" of the attorney-client privilege, appellant "must pursue its claim of attorney-client privilege at this time in order to ensure that its claim not later become moot by reason of the documents' disclosure to third parties"
  6. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 21,891 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system