3 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. International Business Machines Corp.

    83 F.R.D. 97 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)   Cited 122 times
    Denying motion to quash records subpoena for information about which the defendant's chairman intended to testify to establish the government plaintiff's "clear" need given that the documents likely contained information "from which cross-examination may be fashioned"
  2. In re Penn Cent. Commercial Paper Litig.

    61 F.R.D. 453 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that the defendant's parent company had waived the privilege by allowing his attorney to testify about the relevant communication
  3. Collins & Aikman Corp. v. J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc.

    51 F.R.D. 219 (D.S.C. 1971)   Cited 23 times
    Noting "quite strong considerations indicating that the discovery would be more limited to protect third parties from harassment, inconvenience, or disclosure of confidential documents"