16 Cited authorities

  1. Societe Nat. Ind. Aero. v. U.S. Dist. Court

    482 U.S. 522 (1987)   Cited 597 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Hague Convention did not deprive the District Court of the jurisdiction it would otherwise possess to order a foreign national party before it to produce evidence physically located within a signatory nation"
  2. In re Honda American Motor Co., Inc. Dealership Relations Litigation

    168 F.R.D. 535 (D. Md. 1996)   Cited 104 times
    Holding bribery fails to establish investment in or acquiring interest in an enterprise for RICO purposes
  3. Cadent Ltd. v. 3M Unitek Corp.

    232 F.R.D. 625 (C.D. Cal. 2005)   Cited 70 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Denying request for a protective order that required the depositions in the case not be taken in Los Angeles
  4. Afram Export v. Metallurgiki Halyps, S.A

    772 F.2d 1358 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 110 times
    Finding jurisdiction under Wisconsin statute under similar circumstances
  5. Sugarhill Records Ltd. v. Motown Record Corp.

    105 F.R.D. 166 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)   Cited 75 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Indicating that the decision as to the location of the deposition is within the district court's discretion
  6. South Seas Catamaran, Inc. v. the Motor Vessel "Leeway"

    120 F.R.D. 17 (D.N.J. 1988)   Cited 68 times
    Holding that defendant waived objections to venue by not including them in pre-answer motion
  7. Custom Form Mfg., Inc. v. Omron Corp.

    196 F.R.D. 333 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 2000)   Cited 22 times
    Observing that the federal district court's authority to address discovery disputes during the depositions would be compromised by sovereignty issues if the depositions took place in Japan
  8. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Worldwide Ins. Management Corp.

    147 F.R.D. 125 (N.D. Tex. 1992)   Cited 31 times

    Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) sought postjudgment discovery after obtaining $1 million judgment. The District Court, Cobb, Visiting Judge, held that judgment debtor failed to establish that requested postjudgment discovery would be burdensome, embarrassing, or oppressive and it would thus be appropriate to take deposition of designated officer at location of defendant's headquarters. Ordered accordingly. Retta A. Miller, Jackson & Walker, Dallas, TX, for plaintiff. Ira E. Tobolowsky, Tobolowsky

  9. IP Innovation L.L.C. v. Sharp Corp.

    219 F.R.D. 427 (N.D. Ill. 2003)   Cited 11 times
    Finding that plaintiff was not entitled to compel defendant to provide its invalidity defenses until its expert reports were due
  10. Cont'l Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Delta Corp. of Am.

    71 F.R.D. 697 (W.D. Okla. 1976)   Cited 25 times
    In Continental, however, the notice designated the corporation as the deponent, requested the corporation to designate the witness, and specified the matters on which examination was requested, all in accordance with Fed.R. Civ.P. 30(b)(6).
  11. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 16,332 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely
  12. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,238 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"