§Why CasetextPricing

New Jersey Carpenters Vacation Fund et al v. HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-4 et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 15 MOTION to Remand to State Court.. Document

19 Cited authorities

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America

    511 U.S. 375 (1994)   Cited 19,034 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that absent a reservation of jurisdiction in the stipulated dismissal order, federal courts lack jurisdiction to consider enforcement of a settlement agreement

  2. Gaus v. Miles, Inc.

    980 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 10,097 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a conclusory allegation "neither overcomes the 'strong presumption' against removal jurisdiction, nor satisfies [the defendant]'s burden of setting forth, in the removal petition itself, the underlying facts supporting its assertion that the amount in controversy exceeds" the applicable dollar value

  3. Herman MacLean v. Huddleston

    459 U.S. 375 (1983)   Cited 1,311 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an express remedy under § 11 of the 1933 Act for misleading registration statements did not preclude an overlapping implied private cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation under § 10(b) of the 1934 Act

  4. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.

    442 U.S. 330 (1979)   Cited 1,158 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "injury to business or property" was not limited to commercial interests

  5. Reves v. Ernst Young

    494 U.S. 56 (1990)   Cited 438 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Holding "every note" is presumed to be a security

  6. Breuer v. Jim's Concrete of Brevard, Inc.

    538 U.S. 691 (2003)   Cited 156 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a defendant removes a case under 28 U.S.C. § 1441, the burden is on a plaintiff to find an express exception to removal

  7. Lupo v. Human Affairs International, Inc.

    28 F.3d 269 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 627 times
    Holding that removal based on diversity jurisdiction is improper “if the jurisdictional amount is not clearly alleged in the plaintiff's complaint, and the defendant's notice of removal fails to allege facts adequate to establish that the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional amount”

  8. California Public Employees' v. Worldcom, Inc.

    368 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 337 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 22 does not bar removal under § 1452

  9. Hernandez v. J.B. Hunt, Inc.

    No. CV-08-0057 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2008)

    CV-08-0057. March 20, 2008 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHARLES SIFTON, Senior District Judge Plaintiff Andrew Hernandez ("Hernandez") commenced this personal injury action against defendants J.B. Hunt, Inc. ("Hunt") and Kenneth E. Onysko ("Onysko") in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Richmond, pursuant to N.Y. Ins. Law § 5101 et seq. On January 4, 2008, Hunt filed a notice of removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446 seeking to remove this case to the Eastern District of New York

  10. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 111,518 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"

  11. Section 77k - Civil liabilities on account of false registration statement

    15 U.S.C. § 77k   Cited 2,113 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable for a false registration statement "every person who was a director of . . . or partner in the issuer" at time of filing

  12. Section 77b - Definitions; promotion of efficiency, competition, and capital formation

    15 U.S.C. § 77b   Cited 1,404 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Instructing the SEC to consider, "in addition to the protection of investors, whether the action will promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation"

  13. Section 77a - Short title

    15 U.S.C. § 77a   Cited 1,231 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Titling act

  14. Section 77v - Jurisdiction of offenses and suits

    15 U.S.C. § 77v   Cited 1,051 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Granting "concurrent" jurisdiction

  15. Section 77l - Civil liabilities arising in connection with prospectuses and communications

    15 U.S.C. § 77l   Cited 825 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing relief if the offering documents contain just one untrue statement of material fact

  16. Section 77o - Liability of controlling persons

    15 U.S.C. § 77o   Cited 804 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Imposing liability on persons who "control[] any person liable" under §§ 11 or 12

  17. Section 771 - Comptroller General, powers and duties

    15 U.S.C. § 771   Cited 691 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Allowing private cause of action for violations of § 77e

  18. Section 77p - Additional remedies; limitation on remedies

    15 U.S.C. § 77p   Cited 449 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing certain securities class actions to be removed to federal court

  19. Section 4 - Jurisdiction of courts; duty of United States attorneys; procedure

    15 U.S.C. § 4   Cited 422 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting jurisdiction to "prevent and restrain" violations of the Sherman Act to federal district courts