§Why CasetextPricing

Motion_to_tax_costs

Motion

13 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Rowland

    4 Cal.4th 238 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 732 times
    In People v. Rowland (1992) 4 Cal.4th 238, 14 Cal.Rptr.2d 377, 841 P.2d 897, we disapproved the Thompson passage on which he relies.

  2. Davis v. KGO-T.V., Inc.

    17 Cal.4th 436 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 71 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Considering similar language in the California Fair Equipment and Housing Act

  3. Sanabria v. Embrey

    92 Cal.App.4th 422 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 52 times
    Reversing trial courts award of costs where memorandum was untimely filed and the party seeking costs made no claim of mistake or inadvertence

  4. Baker-Hoey v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    111 Cal.App.4th 592 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 43 times

    No. E032995 Filed August 20, 2003 Certified for Publication Appeal from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, No. RCV31496, Ben T. Kayashima, Judge. (Retired Judge of the San Bernardino Sup. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed. Retired judge of the San Bernardino Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution. Gibson, Dunn Crutcher, Robert S. Warren, Robert W. Loewen, David A

  5. Wagner Farms Inc. v. Modesto Irrigation Dist.

    145 Cal.App.4th 765 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 30 times
    Affirming trial court's exercise of its discretion in allowing as “reasonably necessary,” agency's costs of preparing five copies of record, including copies for itself, its outside counsel and its environmental consultant

  6. Rappenecker v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.

    93 Cal.App.3d 256 (Cal. Ct. App. 1979)   Cited 72 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Rappenecker v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 93 Cal. App. 3d 256 (1979), for example, the California Court of Appeal merely held that a stipulated judgment that was silent on costs could not be read to preclude recovery of costs by statute.

  7. Hydratec v. Sun Valley 260 Orchard Vineyard Co.

    223 Cal.App.3d 924 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 48 times
    In Hydratec, the court was faced with a costs and fee dispute following three separate cases that had been consolidated, at a minimum, for the purposes of trial.

  8. Great Western Bank v. Converse Consultants, Inc.

    58 Cal.App.4th 609 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 32 times
    Concluding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to award costs to prevailing party for models, blowups, and photocopies of exhibits where good faith settlement was reached just prior to the commencement of trial

  9. Oak Grove School Dist. v. City Title Ins. Co.

    217 Cal.App.2d 678 (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)   Cited 93 times
    In Oak Grove SchoolDist. v. City Title Ins. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 288] defendants claimed costs and disbursements under Code of Civil Procedure section 1255a after the plaintiff school district abandoned its eminent domain proceeding.

  10. Sanchez v. Bay Shores Medical Group

    75 Cal.App.4th 946 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 6 times

    B124489 (Super. Ct. No. YC023053) Filed October 21, 1999 Certified for Publication Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Jean E. Matusinka, Judge. Affirmed as modified. Schmid Voiles and Suzanne De Rosa for Defendants and Appellants. Appell Wolf, Mervyn H. Wolf and Kelli D. Burritt for Plaintiffs and Respondents. GRIGNON, J. Plaintiffs prevailing in a medical malpractice action were awarded the fees of their medical experts as an item of costs. Because, in a medical

  11. Section 998 - [Effective Until 1/1/2025] Offer served prior to resolution of dispute by arbitration

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 998   Cited 1,478 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Cost-shifting provision applies to a plaintiff who rejects a section 998 offer and "fails to obtain a more favorable judgment"

  12. Section 685.070 - [Effective Until 1/1/2025] Costs judgment creditor may claim in enforcing judgment

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 685.070   Cited 74 times
    Notwithstanding defects in service and notice

  13. Rule 3.1700 - Prejudgment costs

    Cal. R. 3.1700   Cited 278 times

    (a) Claiming costs (1)Trial costs A prevailing party who claims costs must serve and file a memorandum of costs within 15 days after the date of service of the notice of entry of judgment or dismissal by the clerk under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.5 or the date of service of written notice of entry of judgment or dismissal, or within 180 days after entry of judgment, whichever is first. The memorandum of costs must be verified by a statement of the party, attorney, or agent that to the best