§Why CasetextPricing

Navcom Technology, Inc et al v. OKI Semiconductor America, Inc et al

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law

4 Cited authorities

  1. Phillips v. Cmty. Ins. Corp.

    678 F.3d 513 (7th Cir. 2012)   Cited 212 times
    Holding that passive non-compliance does not make a "substantial escalation of force" reasonable

  2. Goodwall Const. Co. v. Beers Const. Co.

    991 F.2d 751 (Fed. Cir. 1993)   Cited 65 times
    Holding that a jury could have concluded that the infringing party concealed incriminating evidence from its opinion counsel

  3. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,441 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"

  4. Rule 50 - Judgment as a Matter of Law in a Jury Trial; Related Motion for a New Trial; Conditional Ruling

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 50   Cited 13,789 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Allowing "renewed motion"