41 Cited authorities

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.
528 U.S. 167 (2000) Cited 7,191 times 25 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing
United States v. Scrap
412 U.S. 669 (1973) Cited 1,365 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the trial court did not err in denying motion to dismiss based on lack of standing because appellees sufficiently alleged "that their members used the forests, streams, mountains, and other resources in the Washington metropolitan area for camping, hiking, fishing, and sightseeing, and that this use was disturbed by the adverse environmental impact caused by the nonuse of recyclable goods brought about by a rate increase on those commodities"
Baur v. Veneman
352 F.3d 625 (2d Cir. 2003) Cited 379 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiff has standing to seek injunction to stop defendants from butchering non-ambulatory cows because of plaintiff's enhanced risk of mad cow disease as a consumer of beef
In re Core Comm., Inc.
531 F.3d 849 (D.C. Cir. 2008) Cited 195 times
Granting a writ of mandamus to force the FCC to issue a final appealable order
Center for Law and Educ. v. Dept. of Educ
396 F.3d 1152 (D.C. Cir. 2005) Cited 199 times
Holding that the organizational plaintiffs failed to demonstrate standing and noting that “[h]ere, the only ‘service' impaired is pure-issue advocacy-the very type of activity distinguished by Havens
Cobell v. Norton
240 F.3d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Cited 220 times
Holding that the Indian canon prevailed over die Chevron doctrine when the two were in conflict
Independence Mining Company, Inc. v. Babbitt
105 F.3d 502 (9th Cir. 1997) Cited 235 times
Holding that the General Mining Act of 1872 “provided no express timetable or deadline for the issuance of the patents” and, “[a]t most, . . . implie[d] that the issuance must be completed within a reasonable time, or . . . ‘expeditiously' under the circumstances”
United States v. Bacto-Unidisk
394 U.S. 784 (1969) Cited 149 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a "antibiotic sensitivity disk," a device used in laboratories to help choose particular antibiotics for treatment was a drug according to the statutory definition
Lafleur v. Whitman
300 F.3d 256 (2d Cir. 2002) Cited 171 times
Holding that a petitioner who lived near the source of air pollution possessed standing
Sierra Club v. Thomas
828 F.2d 783 (D.C. Cir. 1987) Cited 175 times
Holding that non-readily ascertainable requirement “impose merely a ‘general duty’ ” that is not actionable under the Clean Air Act's citizen suit provision
Section 706 - Scope of review
5 U.S.C. § 706 Cited 20,497 times 185 Legal Analyses
Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"
Section 355 - New drugs
21 U.S.C. § 355 Cited 2,250 times 339 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to change the date on which an ANDA may be approved if "either party to the action failed to reasonably cooperate in expediting the action"
Section 321 - Definitions; generally
21 U.S.C. § 321 Cited 1,168 times 165 Legal Analyses
Defining “new drug”
Section 555 - Ancillary matters
5 U.S.C. § 555 Cited 1,145 times 13 Legal Analyses
Providing that an agency's notice of denial "shall be accompanied by a brief statement of the grounds for denial"
Section 393 - Food and Drug Administration
21 U.S.C. § 393 Cited 182 times 10 Legal Analyses
Defining the FDA's mission
Section 330.10 - Procedures for classifying OTC drugs as generally recognized as safe and effective and not misbranded, and for establishing monographs
21 C.F.R. § 330.10 Cited 52 times 2 Legal Analyses
Subjecting "[a]ny product which fails to conform to an applicable monograph" to regulatory action

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al

41 Cited authorities

Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing

Holding that plaintiff has standing to seek injunction to stop defendants from butchering non-ambulatory cows because of plaintiff's enhanced risk of mad cow disease as a consumer of beef

Granting a writ of mandamus to force the FCC to issue a final appealable order

Holding that the organizational plaintiffs failed to demonstrate standing and noting that “[h]ere, the only ‘service' impaired is pure-issue advocacy-the very type of activity distinguished by Havens

Holding that the Indian canon prevailed over die Chevron doctrine when the two were in conflict

Holding that the General Mining Act of 1872 “provided no express timetable or deadline for the issuance of the patents” and, “[a]t most, . . . implie[d] that the issuance must be completed within a reasonable time, or . . . ‘expeditiously' under the circumstances”

Holding that a "antibiotic sensitivity disk," a device used in laboratories to help choose particular antibiotics for treatment was a drug according to the statutory definition

Holding that a petitioner who lived near the source of air pollution possessed standing

Holding that non-readily ascertainable requirement “impose merely a ‘general duty’ ” that is not actionable under the Clean Air Act's citizen suit provision

Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"

Granting the court discretion to change the date on which an ANDA may be approved if "either party to the action failed to reasonably cooperate in expediting the action"

Defining “new drug”

Providing that an agency's notice of denial "shall be accompanied by a brief statement of the grounds for denial"

Defining the FDA's mission

Subjecting "[a]ny product which fails to conform to an applicable monograph" to regulatory action