36 Cited authorities

  1. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agric. Products Co.

    473 U.S. 568 (1985)   Cited 1,258 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a challenge to a statutory system of arbitration was ripe because the plaintiffs' "injury [was] not a function of whether the [arbitration] tribunal awards reasonable compensation but of the tribunal's authority to adjudicate the dispute"
  2. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.

    467 U.S. 986 (1984)   Cited 1,063 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Missouri law, which follows the Restatement of Torts, creates cognizable property right in trade secrets
  3. Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Actavis, Inc.

    570 U.S. 136 (2013)   Cited 308 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "reverse payment settlements . . . can sometimes violate the antitrust laws"
  4. Comdyne I, Inc. v. Corbin

    908 F.2d 1142 (3d Cir. 1990)   Cited 1,221 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when deciding whether to grant a default judgment, "all well-pleaded allegations in a complaint, except those relating to the amount of damages, are admitted as true following a default"
  5. Living Designs, Inc. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Co.

    431 F.3d 353 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 498 times
    Holding that the elements of a civil RICO claim include causal injury to a plaintiff's "business or property"
  6. U.S. v. Curtin

    489 F.3d 935 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 191 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that fictional "stories containing graphic descriptions of sexual acts with minors" were admissible to refute entrapment defense and to prove intent where defendant was the subject of an Internet sting operation in which an FBI agent posed as a minor
  7. United States v. Jannotti

    673 F.2d 578 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 295 times
    Holding that convictions for conspiracy and attempt to violate the Hobbs Act have been sustained even without evidence of an actual effect on interstate commerce
  8. In re Khalil

    578 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 113 times
    Adopting the BAP's statement of applicable law
  9. Rossi v. Standard Roofing, Inc.

    156 F.3d 452 (3d Cir. 1998)   Cited 153 times
    Holding that pretextual excuses to explain a refusal to deal can be circumstantial evidence of a conspiracy
  10. Naporano Iron Metal Co. v. American Crane Corp.

    79 F. Supp. 2d 494 (D.N.J. 2000)   Cited 144 times
    Holding that a plaintiff who purchased a crane for business use is a "consumer"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 346,412 times   923 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden

    15 U.S.C. § 1125   Cited 15,291 times   320 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the person who asserts trade dress protection has the burden of proving that the matter sought to be protected is not functional"
  13. Section 727 - Discharge

    11 U.S.C. § 727   Cited 11,568 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Finding that debtor had "actually intended to hinder and delay a creditor"
  14. Section 56:8-2 - Fraud, etc., in connection with sale or advertisement of merchandise or real estate as unlawful practice

    N.J. Stat. § 56:8-2   Cited 1,246 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting "any unconscionable commercial practice, deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, or the knowing concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact"
  15. Section 56:4-1 - Appropriation of name, brand, trade-mark, reputation or goodwill of maker by dealer in product of maker

    N.J. Stat. § 56:4-1   Cited 232 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No merchant, firm or corporation shall appropriate for his or their own use a name, brand, trade-mark, reputation or goodwill of any maker in whose product such merchant, firm or corporation deals. N.J.S. § 56:4-1 Amended by L.1975, c.107, s.2.