44 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 240,643 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 220,134 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  3. American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sullivan

    526 U.S. 40 (1999)   Cited 5,041 times
    Holding that the private insurers were not state actors
  4. Adickes v. Kress Co.

    398 U.S. 144 (1970)   Cited 25,363 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a private person who conspires with government actors to deprive a plaintiff of her constitutional rights acts "under color of law" for purposes of § 1983
  5. United States v. Salerno

    481 U.S. 739 (1987)   Cited 5,625 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a facial challenger "must establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid"
  6. United Student Aid Funds v. Espinosa

    559 U.S. 260 (2010)   Cited 1,887 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that rule 60(b) applies "in the rare instance where a judgment is premised . . . on a violation of due process that deprives a party of notice or the opportunity to be heard"
  7. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.

    518 U.S. 415 (1996)   Cited 2,385 times
    Holding that district courts have the "primary responsibility" for applying the state-law excessiveness standard because they have "the unique opportunity to consider the evidence in the living courtroom context, while appellate judges see only the cold paper record." (cleaned up)
  8. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. Brooks

    436 U.S. 149 (1978)   Cited 3,704 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendant warehouseman's sale of goods pursuant to a statute authorizing self-help was not state action
  9. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins

    304 U.S. 64 (1938)   Cited 20,719 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law governs substantive issues and federal law governs procedural issues
  10. Taylor v. List

    880 F.2d 1040 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 9,246 times
    Holding that no § 1983 liability exists absent personal participation
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 335,322 times   160 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit