12 Cited authorities

Yee v. City of Escondido
503 U.S. 519 (1992) Cited 711 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that such a rent control ordinance “is a regulation of petitioners' use of their property” and not “an unwanted physical occupation of property”
Kingman Park Civic Ass'n v. Williams
348 F.3d 1033 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 237 times
Upholding district court's refusal to exercise supplemental jurisdiction
Kattan by Thomas v. District of Columbia
995 F.2d 274 (D.C. Cir. 1993) Cited 247 times
Holding that argument not raised in opposition to motion was waived
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharms., Inc.
778 F.3d 142 (D.C. Cir. 2015) Cited 91 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that records qualify for protection under the attorney work-product privilege when "in light of the nature of the document and the factual situation in the particular case, the document can fairly be said to have been prepared or obtained because of the prospect of litigation" (quoting United States v. Deloitte LLP , 610 F.3d 129, 137 (D.C. Cir. 2010) )
Whelan v. Abell
48 F.3d 1247 (D.C. Cir. 1995) Cited 133 times
Holding that appellant waived its claim that its opponent had waived the protections of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine by failing to assert the opponent's waiver
Marymount Hosp., Inc. v. Shalala
19 F.3d 658 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Cited 46 times
Noting that arguments not made below generally are deemed waived
Bruder v. Chu
953 F. Supp. 2d 234 (D.D.C. 2013) Cited 13 times
Explaining that for claim based on workload distribution, plaintiff must show loss of "promotional possibilities"
Grimes v. District of Columbia
923 F. Supp. 2d 196 (D.D.C. 2013) Cited 8 times
Granting summary judgment because “the non movant fail[ed] to demonstrate a genuine dispute as to any material fact”
McCauley v. Salazar
38 F. Supp. 3d 35 (D.D.C. 2014) Cited 1 times
Granting summary judgment where pro se plaintiff failed to prove there existed a genuine dispute of material fact
Zolfaghari v. Sheikholeslami
943 F.2d 451 (4th Cir. 1991) Cited 7 times
Recognizing that "securities" include "participation interests in a managed pool of mortgage notes"
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 328,736 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Rule 23 - Class Actions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 Cited 34,931 times 1234 Legal Analyses
Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"

National Veterans Legal Services Program et al v. United States of America

12 Cited authorities

Holding that such a rent control ordinance “is a regulation of petitioners' use of their property” and not “an unwanted physical occupation of property”

Upholding district court's refusal to exercise supplemental jurisdiction

Holding that argument not raised in opposition to motion was waived

Holding that appellant waived its claim that its opponent had waived the protections of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine by failing to assert the opponent's waiver

Noting that arguments not made below generally are deemed waived

Explaining that for claim based on workload distribution, plaintiff must show loss of "promotional possibilities"

Granting summary judgment because “the non movant fail[ed] to demonstrate a genuine dispute as to any material fact”

Granting summary judgment where pro se plaintiff failed to prove there existed a genuine dispute of material fact

Recognizing that "securities" include "participation interests in a managed pool of mortgage notes"

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"