181 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,874 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.

    528 U.S. 167 (2000)   Cited 7,162 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing
  3. District of Columbia et al. v. Heller

    554 U.S. 570 (2008)   Cited 3,486 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"
  4. Roper v. Simmons

    543 U.S. 551 (2005)   Cited 3,502 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding "that the death penalty cannot be imposed upon juvenile offenders"
  5. McDonald v. City of Chicago

    561 U.S. 742 (2010)   Cited 2,291 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment
  6. Warth v. Seldin

    422 U.S. 490 (1975)   Cited 11,880 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Article III requires plaintiffs "to establish that, in fact, the asserted injury was the consequence of the defendants' actions"
  7. United States v. Salerno

    481 U.S. 739 (1987)   Cited 5,410 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "extensive safeguards" are necessary "to repel a facial challenge"
  8. Powers v. Ohio

    499 U.S. 400 (1991)   Cited 2,550 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a white defendant has standing to challenge strikes of black jurors
  9. U.S. v. Stevens

    559 U.S. 460 (2010)   Cited 1,155 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding law unconstitutional under First Amendment where "impermissible applications ... far outnumber[ed] any permissible ones"
  10. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey

    505 U.S. 833 (1992)   Cited 1,859 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a spousal notification provision was unconstitutional
  11. Section 922 - Unlawful acts

    18 U.S.C. § 922   Cited 60,470 times   181 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"
  12. Section 921 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 921   Cited 4,071 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Adopting this definition
  13. Section 8 - Powers of Congress

    U.S. Const. art. I, § 8   Cited 6,974 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Granting Congress the power to “provide for the common Defence,” to “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations,” and to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization”
  14. Section Amendment II - Bearing Arms

    U.S. Const. amend. II   Cited 1,315 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that a well regulated Militia is necessary to the security of a free State
  15. Section 400.00 - Licensing and other provisions relating to firearms

    N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00   Cited 365 times
    Noting that "good cause" may require "the denial of the license"
  16. Section 5801 - Imposition of tax

    26 U.S.C. § 5801   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Imposing an annual tax of $500 to $1,000 on "every importer, manufacturer, and dealer in firearms"
  17. Section 13-5-1 - Who are competent jurors; determination of literacy

    Miss. Code § 13-5-1   Cited 68 times
    Setting forth jury questionnaire information
  18. Section 12-16-60 - Qualifications of jurors

    Ala. Code § 12-16-60   Cited 55 times
    Requiring a juror to be able to read instructions given by the judge
  19. Section 2923.21 - Improperly furnishing firearms to minor

    Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.21   Cited 44 times
    Prohibiting the transfer of guns to minors
  20. Section 478.11 - Meaning of terms

    27 C.F.R. § 478.11   Cited 77 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining unlawful as "any alien ... [w]ho is a nonimmigrant and whose authorized period of stay has expired or who has violated the terms of the nonimmigrant category in which he or she was admitted."