Holding that the federal reporter's privilege is "intended to protect the public's interest in being informed by 'a vigorous, aggressive and independent press"'
Holding that the district court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment as conceded because the plaintiff failed to file a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the defendant's motion
Holding that it was proper to disclose impeachment evidence before trial because the "putative key witness, whose general testimony is already known, is scheduled to testify"
Affirming prior decision which recognized that the qualified journalist's privilege for confidential information can be overcome upon a " ‘ sufficiently compelling need’ " which " ‘ [a]t a minimum ... requires a showing that the information sought is not obtainable from another source’ " and setting a lower standard where the information is non-confidential.