51 Cited authorities

Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside
578 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2009) Cited 14,085 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"
Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp.
486 U.S. 800 (1988) Cited 3,127 times 21 Legal Analyses
Holding that the appeal belonged before the regional circuit because the claims did not arise under patent law
Arizona v. California
460 U.S. 605 (1983) Cited 2,210 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that res judicata barred re-opening the quantification of tribes' Winters rights
Emp’rs Mut. Cas. v. Bartile Roofs
618 F.3d 1153 (10th Cir. 2010) Cited 610 times
Holding that under Utah law, the policy definition of the term "suit" made the insurer's duty to defend dependent on the underlying allegations of liability
Starnes v. McGuire
512 F.2d 918 (D.C. Cir. 1974) Cited 1,109 times
Holding that it is “essential that procedures be adopted and observed that will provide plaintiffs a fair opportunity to seek review in the transferor circuit prior to the physical transfer of the record.”
Moses v. Business Card Exp., Inc.
929 F.2d 1131 (6th Cir. 1991) Cited 590 times
Holding that a "court should consider the private interests of the parties, including their convenience and the convenience of potential witnesses, as well as other public-interest concerns, such as systemic integrity and fairness, which come under the rubric of 'interests of justice.' "
Fogel v. Chestnutt
668 F.2d 100 (2d Cir. 1981) Cited 262 times
Finding that where the court previously held that the plaintiffs had stated a claim for breach of fiduciary duty pursuant to a federal statute, the court "necessarily assumed" that the federal statute included a private right of action
Hawkins v. Harris
141 N.J. 207 (N.J. 1995) Cited 170 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that private investigator hired by litigants was entitled to absolute immunity
Michaels v. State of N.J.
955 F. Supp. 315 (D.N.J. 1996) Cited 151 times
Holding that "[b]ecause the City of Newark is a public entity within the meaning of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act . . . all of plaintiff's state law claims asserted against it . . . are subject to the Act's two-year statute of limitations"
Collins v. McKinney
871 N.E.2d 363 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) Cited 111 times
Holding that a jury could have found that the arrangement in question constituted an equitable assignment of the sublease
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 345,885 times 922 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Section 1404 - Change of venue
28 U.S.C. § 1404 Cited 28,366 times 184 Legal Analyses
Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR

Nambe, Llc v. Lenox Corporation

51 Cited authorities

Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"

Holding that the appeal belonged before the regional circuit because the claims did not arise under patent law

Holding that res judicata barred re-opening the quantification of tribes' Winters rights

Holding that under Utah law, the policy definition of the term "suit" made the insurer's duty to defend dependent on the underlying allegations of liability

Holding that it is “essential that procedures be adopted and observed that will provide plaintiffs a fair opportunity to seek review in the transferor circuit prior to the physical transfer of the record.”

Holding that a "court should consider the private interests of the parties, including their convenience and the convenience of potential witnesses, as well as other public-interest concerns, such as systemic integrity and fairness, which come under the rubric of 'interests of justice.' "

Finding that where the court previously held that the plaintiffs had stated a claim for breach of fiduciary duty pursuant to a federal statute, the court "necessarily assumed" that the federal statute included a private right of action

Holding that private investigator hired by litigants was entitled to absolute immunity

Holding that "[b]ecause the City of Newark is a public entity within the meaning of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act . . . all of plaintiff's state law claims asserted against it . . . are subject to the Act's two-year statute of limitations"

Holding that a jury could have found that the arrangement in question constituted an equitable assignment of the sublease

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR