65 Cited authorities

Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 267,331 times 365 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
564 U.S. 338 (2011) Cited 6,647 times 505 Legal Analyses
Holding in Rule 23 context that “[w]ithout some glue holding the alleged reasons for all those decisions together, it will be impossible to say that examination of all the class members' claims for relief will produce a common answer”
Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor
521 U.S. 591 (1997) Cited 6,963 times 69 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts are "bound to enforce" Rule 23's certification requirements, even where it means decertifying a class after they had reached a settlement agreement and submitted it to the court for approval
General Electric Co. v. Joiner
522 U.S. 136 (1997) Cited 4,871 times 42 Legal Analyses
Holding that under the abuse of discretion standard the appellate court will not reverse unless the ruling is manifestly erroneous
Comcast Corp. v. Behrend
569 U.S. 27 (2013) Cited 2,236 times 232 Legal Analyses
Holding that at the class certification stage, "any model supporting a plaintiff's damages case must be consistent with its liability case"
Shady Grove Orthopedic v. Allstate Ins. Co.
559 U.S. 393 (2010) Cited 1,154 times 44 Legal Analyses
Holding that rules of civil procedure allowing multiple claims to be litigated together "neither change plaintiffs' separate entitlements to relief nor abridge defendants' rights; they alter only how the claims are processed"
Eisen v. Carlisle Jacquelin
417 U.S. 156 (1974) Cited 3,765 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding that individual notice to class members identifiable through reasonable efforts is mandatory in (b) actions
Califano v. Yamasaki
442 U.S. 682 (1979) Cited 1,982 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that claimants could bring social security class action "at least so long as the membership of the class is limited to those who meet the requirements of § 205(g)"
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.
495 U.S. 328 (1990) Cited 836 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that an antitrust injury is an injury that is "attributable to an anti-competitive aspect of the practice under scrutiny"
Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois
431 U.S. 720 (1977) Cited 1,288 times 61 Legal Analyses
Holding that indirect purchasers cannot recover damages under federal antitrust law
Rule 23 - Class Actions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 Cited 34,993 times 1236 Legal Analyses
Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
Section 2072 - Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe
28 U.S.C. § 2072 Cited 1,805 times 37 Legal Analyses
Granting the Supreme Court, not the parties, authority to "prescribe general rules of practice and procedure" for federal district court cases

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company et al

65 Cited authorities

Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

Holding in Rule 23 context that “[w]ithout some glue holding the alleged reasons for all those decisions together, it will be impossible to say that examination of all the class members' claims for relief will produce a common answer”

Holding that courts are "bound to enforce" Rule 23's certification requirements, even where it means decertifying a class after they had reached a settlement agreement and submitted it to the court for approval

Holding that under the abuse of discretion standard the appellate court will not reverse unless the ruling is manifestly erroneous

Holding that at the class certification stage, "any model supporting a plaintiff's damages case must be consistent with its liability case"

Holding that rules of civil procedure allowing multiple claims to be litigated together "neither change plaintiffs' separate entitlements to relief nor abridge defendants' rights; they alter only how the claims are processed"

Holding that individual notice to class members identifiable through reasonable efforts is mandatory in (b) actions

Holding that claimants could bring social security class action "at least so long as the membership of the class is limited to those who meet the requirements of § 205(g)"

Holding that an antitrust injury is an injury that is "attributable to an anti-competitive aspect of the practice under scrutiny"

Holding that indirect purchasers cannot recover damages under federal antitrust law

Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"

Granting the Supreme Court, not the parties, authority to "prescribe general rules of practice and procedure" for federal district court cases