36 Cited authorities

General Electric Co. v. Joiner
522 U.S. 136 (1997) Cited 4,870 times 42 Legal Analyses
Holding that under the abuse of discretion standard the appellate court will not reverse unless the ruling is manifestly erroneous
Comcast Corp. v. Behrend
569 U.S. 27 (2013) Cited 2,236 times 232 Legal Analyses
Holding that at the class certification stage, "any model supporting a plaintiff's damages case must be consistent with its liability case"
In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litigation
35 F.3d 717 (3d Cir. 1994) Cited 2,111 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding an expert's testimony unreliable because he did not consider alternative causes
Bickerstaff v. Vassar College
196 F.3d 435 (2d Cir. 1999) Cited 1,331 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding affidavits based on conclusory allegations insufficient at summary judgment
Oddi v. Ford Motor Co.
234 F.3d 136 (3d Cir. 2000) Cited 609 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a record consisting of a preliminary report, an amended report, an affidavit prepared to meet the adversary's Daubert challenge, and multiple depositions was sufficient to obviate the need for a Daubert hearing
ZF Meritor, LLC v. Eaton Corp.
696 F.3d 254 (3d Cir. 2012) Cited 362 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding plaintiff who "expressed no concrete desire" to "reenter the market" lacked standing to seek prospective relief on antitrust claim
Blades v. Monsanto Co.
400 F.3d 562 (8th Cir. 2005) Cited 359 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that sometimes courts will be required to resolve factual disputes preliminarily at the class certification stage but voicing caution
Elcock v. Kmart Corp.
228 F.3d 448 (3d Cir. 2000) Cited 262 times
Holding that a district court could not consider, for Rule 702 analysis of reliability of an expert's methods, a challenge to the expert's credibility based on a past embezzlement charge
In re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation
295 F.3d 651 (7th Cir. 2002) Cited 247 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that fixing a “list price” would constitute a per se antitrust violation even if the list price was only a “guide to likely transaction purchases”
Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp.
207 F.3d 1039 (8th Cir. 2000) Cited 255 times
Holding that "[b]ecause of the deficiencies in the foundation of the opinion, the expert's resulting conclusions were mere speculation"
Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses
Fed. R. Evid. 702 Cited 26,699 times 256 Legal Analyses
Adopting the Daubert standard

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company et al

36 Cited authorities

Holding that under the abuse of discretion standard the appellate court will not reverse unless the ruling is manifestly erroneous

Holding that at the class certification stage, "any model supporting a plaintiff's damages case must be consistent with its liability case"

Holding an expert's testimony unreliable because he did not consider alternative causes

Holding affidavits based on conclusory allegations insufficient at summary judgment

Holding that a record consisting of a preliminary report, an amended report, an affidavit prepared to meet the adversary's Daubert challenge, and multiple depositions was sufficient to obviate the need for a Daubert hearing

Holding plaintiff who "expressed no concrete desire" to "reenter the market" lacked standing to seek prospective relief on antitrust claim

Holding that sometimes courts will be required to resolve factual disputes preliminarily at the class certification stage but voicing caution

Holding that a district court could not consider, for Rule 702 analysis of reliability of an expert's methods, a challenge to the expert's credibility based on a past embezzlement charge

Holding that fixing a “list price” would constitute a per se antitrust violation even if the list price was only a “guide to likely transaction purchases”

Holding that "[b]ecause of the deficiencies in the foundation of the opinion, the expert's resulting conclusions were mere speculation"

Adopting the Daubert standard