Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (1993) Cited 26,238 times 224 Legal AnalysesHolding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
526 U.S. 137 (1999) Cited 12,586 times 28 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"
Comm. Benefits Gr. v. McKesson Corp.
326 F. App'x 369 (6th Cir. 2009) Cited 121 timesHolding that the plaintiff did not demonstrate good cause where it "could not adequately explain its delay in bringing the claims [that it sought to add]" and "the factual basis for the new claims existed at the beginning of the lawsuit"
Scarff Bros., Inc. v. Bischer Farms, Inc.
546 F. Supp. 2d 473 (E.D. Mich. 2008) Cited 9 timesCase No. 04-10071-BC. March 5, 2008. Deborah L. Fish, Timothy R. Graves, Allard Fish, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant. H. Dale Cubitt, Cubitt and Cubitt, Bad Axe, MI, for Defendants. OPINION THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge. The parties' quest to account for cattle inventory, the core dispute in this case, culminated in almost four years of litigation and a lengthy bench trial. On September 6, 2007, after the bench trial had already spanned 17 half-days, the Court issued an order
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 94,611 times 650 Legal AnalysesAdopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses
Fed. R. Evid. 702 Cited 26,600 times 253 Legal AnalysesAdopting the Daubert standard