13 Cited authorities

Gonzalez v. Crosby
545 U.S. 524 (2005) Cited 6,105 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Rule 60(b) motion challenging a district court's application of the statute of limitations was not successive
United States v. Ruiz
536 U.S. 622 (2002) Cited 1,508 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that "Constitution does not require the Government to disclose material impeachment evidence prior to entering a plea agreement with a criminal defendant" because "impeachment information is special in relation to the fairness of a trial"
United States v. Mine Workers
330 U.S. 258 (1947) Cited 2,632 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a party may be punished for disobeying a court order even if the court was ultimately determined to lack jurisdiction to issue the order
Ackermann v. United States
340 U.S. 193 (1950) Cited 1,586 times
Holding that petitioners were not entitled to relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) when they made a "free, calculated, deliberate choic[e]" not to appeal
Klapprott v. United States
336 U.S. 942 (1949) Cited 1,269 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may not seek relief under the Rule 60(b) catchall provision if the conduct, in fact, falls under Rule 60(b)
Boumediene v. Bush President of U.S.
127 S. Ct. 3078 (2007) Cited 3 times 1 Legal Analyses
Nos. 06-1195, 06-1196 June 29, 2007. CERTIORARI GRANTED The petitions for rehearing are granted. The orders entered April 2, 2007, denying the petitions for writs of certiorari are vacated. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. As it would be of material assistance to consult any decision in Bismullah, et al., v. Gates, No. 06-1197 and Parhat, et al., v. Gates, No. 06-1397 currently pending in the United
Boumediene v. Bush
476 F.3d 981 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 41 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding alien detained as enemy combatant at Guantánamo Bay has no constitutional right to writ of habeas corpus
Maxwell v. Snow
409 F.3d 354 (D.C. Cir. 2005) Cited 26 times
Finding "patently frivolous" the plaintiff's "requests for declarations that laws passed by Congress [did] not apply to [him] as a `sovereign citizen of the Union of the State of Texas'"
Robinson v. Crosby
358 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) Cited 16 times
Declining to grant a stay pending the Supreme Court's decision in another case because "the grant of certiorari alone is not enough to change the law of this circuit or to justify this Court in granting a stay of execution on the possibility that the Supreme Court may overturn circuit law"
Chambers v. U.S.
22 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 1994) Cited 21 times
Rejecting the argument filed panel decision is not binding until mandate issues and stating "[i]n this circuit, once a published opinion is filed, it becomes the law of the circuit until withdrawn or reversed by the Supreme Court or an en banc court."

Mousovi et al v. Bush et al

13 Cited authorities

Holding that a Rule 60(b) motion challenging a district court's application of the statute of limitations was not successive

Holding that "Constitution does not require the Government to disclose material impeachment evidence prior to entering a plea agreement with a criminal defendant" because "impeachment information is special in relation to the fairness of a trial"

Holding that a party may be punished for disobeying a court order even if the court was ultimately determined to lack jurisdiction to issue the order

Holding that petitioners were not entitled to relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) when they made a "free, calculated, deliberate choic[e]" not to appeal

Holding a party may not seek relief under the Rule 60(b) catchall provision if the conduct, in fact, falls under Rule 60(b)

Holding alien detained as enemy combatant at Guantánamo Bay has no constitutional right to writ of habeas corpus

Finding "patently frivolous" the plaintiff's "requests for declarations that laws passed by Congress [did] not apply to [him] as a `sovereign citizen of the Union of the State of Texas'"

Declining to grant a stay pending the Supreme Court's decision in another case because "the grant of certiorari alone is not enough to change the law of this circuit or to justify this Court in granting a stay of execution on the possibility that the Supreme Court may overturn circuit law"

Rejecting the argument filed panel decision is not binding until mandate issues and stating "[i]n this circuit, once a published opinion is filed, it becomes the law of the circuit until withdrawn or reversed by the Supreme Court or an en banc court."