19 Cited authorities

  1. Crown, Cork Seal Co. v. Parker

    462 U.S. 345 (1983)   Cited 1,104 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the commencement of a class action suspends the applicable statute of limitations for all asserted members of the putative class until a class certification decision is made
  2. East Texas Motor Freight v. Rodriguez

    431 U.S. 395 (1977)   Cited 1,303 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs who lacked qualifications to be hired as drivers suffered no injury from alleged discriminatory practices and therefore lacked standing to represent class of persons who did suffer injury
  3. Castaneda v. Partida

    430 U.S. 482 (1977)   Cited 1,228 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the respondent's showing "that the population of the county was 79.1% Mexican-American, but that, over an 11-year period, only 39% of the persons summoned for grand jury service were Mexican-American" established a prima facie case of discrimination against Mexican-Americans in the county's grand jury selection process
  4. Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.

    151 F.3d 402 (5th Cir. 1998)   Cited 694 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certification under Rule 23(b) was not appropriate because "plaintiffs' claims for compensatory and punitive damages must therefore focus almost entirely on facts and issues specific to individuals rather than the class as a whole"
  5. Mullen v. Treasure Chest Casino

    186 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 1999)   Cited 390 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court "reasonably presumed that those potential class members still employer by [the defendant employer] might be unwilling to sue individually or join a suit for fear of retaliation at their jobs" such that class certification was proper
  6. Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 253 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Arguing that inadmissible expert testimony cannot be used to meet Rule 23
  7. Brazos River Auth. v. GE Ionics, Inc.

    469 F.3d 416 (5th Cir. 2006)   Cited 276 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party “violated rule 30(b) by failing to prepare” a witness “with respect to issues that although not within his personal knowledge, were within the corporate knowledge of the organization”
  8. Lightbourn v. County of El Paso

    118 F.3d 421 (5th Cir. 1997)   Cited 281 times
    Finding plaintiffs failed to state § 504 claim against the Secretary of the State of Texas when they failed to argue or present evidence that secretary received federal financial assistance; evidence that state received financial assistance was not sufficient to establish jurisdiction over secretary
  9. James v. City of Dall.

    254 F.3d 551 (5th Cir. 2001)   Cited 241 times
    Seeking removal of liens and the clearing of titles
  10. In re Monumental Life Ins. Co.

    365 F.3d 408 (5th Cir. 2004)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the issue of whether individual claims were barred by statute of limitations did not predominate over request for injunctive relief so as to preclude certification of class because a theory of constructive notice, which could be decided on class-wide basis
  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 486,856 times   688 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation
  12. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 34,923 times   1234 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  13. Section 59.03 - Seizure of Contraband

    Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 59.03   Cited 16 times
    Stating a peace officer who has custody of property "shall provide the attorney representing the state with a sworn statement that contains a schedule of the property seized, an acknowledgment that the officer has seized the property, and a list of the officer's reasons for the seizure"
  14. Section 2.132 - [Repealed Effective 1/1/2025] Law Enforcement Policy On Racial Profiling

    Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 2.132   Cited 3 times

    (a) In this article: (1) "Law enforcement agency" means an agency of the state, or of a county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the state, that employs peace officers who make motor vehicle stops in the routine performance of the officers' official duties. (2) "Motor vehicle stop" means an occasion in which a peace officer stops a motor vehicle for an alleged violation of a law or ordinance. (3) "Race or ethnicity" means the following categories: (A) Alaska native or American Indian;