§Why CasetextPricing

Morris et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction

72 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 16,777 times   56 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"

  2. District of Columbia et al. v. Heller

    554 U.S. 570 (2008)   Cited 3,459 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"

  3. Engquist v. Oregon Dep't of Agric.

    553 U.S. 591 (2008)   Cited 2,560 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a class-of-one equal-protection claim cannot be raised in the public-employment context based in part upon the discretionary nature of the employment decisions

  4. McDonald v. City of Chicago

    561 U.S. 742 (2010)   Cited 2,276 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment

  5. Kyllo v. United States

    533 U.S. 27 (2001)   Cited 1,610 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the use of a thermal imager to detect heat radiating from a home was a search

  6. Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho

    521 U.S. 261 (1997)   Cited 1,649 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, because "navigable waters uniquely implicate sovereign interests," there exists a "strong presumption of state ownership" of these waters

  7. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell

    632 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 3,900 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a “serious questions” version of the sliding scale approach to preliminary injunctions survives Winter

  8. R.A.V. v. St. Paul

    505 U.S. 377 (1992)   Cited 1,613 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding the government may not "license one side of a debate to fight freestyle, while requiring the other to follow Marquis of Queensberry rules"

  9. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.

    571 F.3d 873 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 2,167 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a motion for reconsideration should not be used to present evidence that should have been presented previously

  10. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill

    437 U.S. 153 (1978)   Cited 1,510 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that budget appropriations cannot alter meaning of statute

  11. Section 702 - Right of review

    5 U.S.C. § 702   Cited 7,051 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting judicial review of "agency action"

  12. Section 2401 - Time for commencing action against United States

    28 U.S.C. § 2401   Cited 6,190 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Establishing that an FTCA claim must be brought in writing to the relevant agency within two years after accrual of the claim

  13. Section 2409a - Real property quiet title actions

    28 U.S.C. § 2409a   Cited 885 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing action "to adjudicate a disputed title to real property in which the United States claims an interest"

  14. Section 327.13 - Explosives, firearms, other weapons and fireworks

    36 C.F.R. § 327.13   Cited 12 times

    (a) The possession of loaded firearms, ammunition, loaded projectile firing devices, bows and arrows, crossbows, or other weapons is prohibited unless: (1) In the possession of a Federal, state or local law enforcement officer; (2) Being used for hunting or fishing as permitted under § 327.8 , with devices being unloaded when transported to, from or between hunting and fishing sites; (3) Being used at authorized shooting ranges; or (4) Written permission has been received from the District Commander

  15. Section 1903.1 - Definitions

    32 C.F.R. § 1903.1

    As used in this part: Agency installation. For the purposes of this part, the term Agency installation means property owned, leased, or controlled by the Central Intelligence Agency, property controlled and occupied by the Federal Highway Administration located immediately adjacent to the CIA Headquarters Compound, and property owned, leased, or controlled by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Authorized person. An officer of the Security Protective Service, or any other Central

  16. Section 234.1 - Definitions

    32 C.F.R. § 234.1

    As used in this part. Authorized person. An employee or agent of the Pentagon Force Protection Agency, or any other Department of Defense employee or agent who has delegated authority to enforce the provisions of this part. Operator. A person who operates, drives, controls, otherwise has charge of, or is in actual physical control of a mechanical mode of transportation or any other mechanical equipment. Pentagon Reservation. Area of land and improvements thereon, located in Arlington, Virginia, on