62 Cited authorities

Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 266,697 times 365 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 27,840 times 138 Legal Analyses
Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (1966) Cited 60,313 times 64 Legal Analyses
Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment
District of Columbia et al. v. Heller
554 U.S. 570 (2008) Cited 3,466 times 50 Legal Analyses
Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"
United States v. Leon
468 U.S. 897 (1984) Cited 10,261 times 72 Legal Analyses
Holding that when a warrant is "subsequently invalidated," suppression is not necessary so long as the warrant was issued by a neutral magistrate and the officers' reliance on the warrant was objectively reasonable
Engquist v. Oregon Dep't of Agric.
553 U.S. 591 (2008) Cited 2,560 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that a class-of-one equal-protection claim cannot be raised in the public-employment context based in part upon the discretionary nature of the employment decisions
McDonald v. City of Chicago
561 U.S. 742 (2010) Cited 2,281 times 21 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment
United States v. Salerno
481 U.S. 739 (1987) Cited 5,401 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that "extensive safeguards" are necessary "to repel a facial challenge"
Barker v. Wingo
407 U.S. 514 (1972) Cited 11,605 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that defendant who fails to demand speedy trial does not forever waive that constitutional right
Hudson v. Michigan
547 U.S. 586 (2006) Cited 1,436 times 37 Legal Analyses
Holding that violation of “knock-and-announce” rule under Fourth Amendment did not require suppression of evidence where deterrence benefits would be outweighed by substantial social costs
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 345,981 times 922 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Section 922 - Unlawful acts
18 U.S.C. § 922 Cited 60,375 times 181 Legal Analyses
Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"
Section 327.13 - Explosives, firearms, other weapons and fireworks
36 C.F.R. § 327.13 Cited 12 times
(a) The possession of loaded firearms, ammunition, loaded projectile firing devices, bows and arrows, crossbows, or other weapons is prohibited unless: (1) In the possession of a Federal, state or local law enforcement officer; (2) Being used for hunting or fishing as permitted under § 327.8 , with devices being unloaded when transported to, from or between hunting and fishing sites; (3) Being used at authorized shooting ranges; or (4) Written permission has been received from the District Commander
Section 234.10 - Weapons
32 C.F.R. § 234.10 Cited 1 times
(a) Except as otherwise authorized under this section, the following are prohibited: (1) Possessing a weapon. (2) Carrying a weapon. (3) Using a weapon. (b) This section does not apply to any agency or Department of Defense component that has received prior written approval from the Pentagon Force Protection Agency or the Installation Commander to carry, transport, or use a weapon in support of a security, law enforcement, or other lawful purpose while on the Pentagon Reservation. 32 C.F.R. § 234
Section 1903.1 - Definitions
32 C.F.R. § 1903.1
As used in this part: Agency installation. For the purposes of this part, the term Agency installation means property owned, leased, or controlled by the Central Intelligence Agency, property controlled and occupied by the Federal Highway Administration located immediately adjacent to the CIA Headquarters Compound, and property owned, leased, or controlled by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Authorized person. An officer of the Security Protective Service, or any other Central
Section 234.1 - Definitions
32 C.F.R. § 234.1
As used in this part. Authorized person. An employee or agent of the Pentagon Force Protection Agency, or any other Department of Defense employee or agent who has delegated authority to enforce the provisions of this part. Operator. A person who operates, drives, controls, otherwise has charge of, or is in actual physical control of a mechanical mode of transportation or any other mechanical equipment. Pentagon Reservation. Area of land and improvements thereon, located in Arlington, Virginia, on
Section 1903.10 - Weapons
32 C.F.R. § 1903.10
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, knowingly possessing or causing to be present a weapon on an Agency installation, or attempting to do so is prohibited. (b) Knowingly possessing or causing to be present a weapon on an Agency installation, incident to hunting or other lawful purposes is prohibited. (c) This section does not apply: (1) To any person who has received authorization from the CIA Director of Security, or from his or her designee, to possess, carry, transport, or

Morris et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al

62 Cited authorities

Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment

Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"

Holding that when a warrant is "subsequently invalidated," suppression is not necessary so long as the warrant was issued by a neutral magistrate and the officers' reliance on the warrant was objectively reasonable

Holding that a class-of-one equal-protection claim cannot be raised in the public-employment context based in part upon the discretionary nature of the employment decisions

Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment

Holding that "extensive safeguards" are necessary "to repel a facial challenge"

Holding that defendant who fails to demand speedy trial does not forever waive that constitutional right

Holding that violation of “knock-and-announce” rule under Fourth Amendment did not require suppression of evidence where deterrence benefits would be outweighed by substantial social costs

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"